Ep 237. - MAGA and Mamdani with Imam Tom Facchine

You can also listen to the episode using the links below, remember to subscribe so you never miss a show

AppleSpotify • GoogleStitcher • or on Alexa

Please leave us a review on Apple Podcasts and a rating on Spotify - it helps us reach a wider audience

The return of Donald Trump to office raises the question of how far Americans have moved away from the ideas that underpinned its rise to globalism after 1945. What is Make America Great Again, and how important is this moment.

I am here in New York with Imam Tom Facchine, one of the most astute commentators of America politics in our community. We look at the MAGA movement and the Mamdani moment. What does his victory mean for our community and how should we judge Zohran’s politics? Imam Tom Facchine is research director at Yaqeen Institute.

You can find Yaqeen Institute here:

X: https://x.com/yaqeeninstitute

IG: https://www.instagram.com/yaqeeninstitute?

Become a member here:

https://www.thinkingmuslim.com/membership

You can also support The Thinking Muslim through a one-time donation: https://www.thinkingmuslim.com/Donate

Listen to the audio version of the podcast:

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/7vXiAjVFnhNI3T9Gkw636a

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/the-thinking-muslim/id1471798762

Sign up to Muhammad Jalal's newsletter: https://jalalayn.substack.com

Transcript - This is an AI generated transcript and may not reflect the actual conversation

Introduction

0:00

and the disillusionment that people feel when  it comes to the corruption of the American  

0:05

political system from top to bottom new York  City is so expensive that even the delies have   to sell drugs uh in order to pay the rent how would you describe make America great  

0:14

again make America great again I think is the  greatest phrase ever used in politics right 

0:20

maga is a project that is born out of the  Tea Party movement the uh the good old days  

0:26

rolling back uh America to a point where yeah  racial segregation was the norm and apartheid  

0:31

was the norm and so what does the grain of  truth the MAGA movement represents I'm here   in New York with Imam Tom Fikini one of the  most astute commentators of American politics  

0:41

within the Muslim community we look at the MAGA  movement and the Mandani moment what does his  

0:48

victory mean for our community and how should  we judge Zaharan's polic Namani says "I'm only  

0:56

focused on New York." That is a radical message  then that is not just the lesser of two evils  

1:01

that that is a strategic win for the Muslim  community and it has to be taken seriously

1:11

tom Finalamikum and welcome to the Thinking  Muslim here in New York it's a pleasure to be  

1:18

together anywhere in the world welcome to the  United States i think you you're one of the   few guests in fact the only guest now that's  been to our London studio our Istanbul studio  

1:27

and now inshallah it's not quite a studio  but our our New York setup alhamdulillah  i'll expect my award in the mail yeah you your your award  

1:35

is another thinking Muslim month now it's my my honor well look Jazakare for for   joining us and um the I suppose the plan today is  to to really understand Trump's America and I've  

1:46

been here for a couple of weeks or a week in a bit  and u I'm just getting a feel for the politics of  

1:52

his country and and how people are responding  we're in the midst of a crisis over Iran and  

1:59

Israel uh but um some things have really struck  me in particular um uh magism and and Trumpism  

2:07

and what that really means so I want to get to the  the details today and understand uh ideologically  

2:13

what does all of that mean for for uh for American  society but let's start with the immediate we're  

New York mayoral elections

2:19

here in New York and uh we're we're meeting on  the day of the primary election uh for Democratic  

2:27

mayor sort of Democratic mayoral candidates will  be uh will be or candidate will be elected today  

2:34

and uh Zahan Mani is tipped to be potentially uh  the Democratic mayoral candidate now how important  

2:42

is this contest you think alhamdulillah uh always  an honor i we're ditching the imam's hat today  

2:50

because we're only talking about politics um so  the New York mayoral race is very important it's  

2:58

the largest city in the United States um it has  a extremely vibrant Muslim community of different  

3:06

you know generations we've got you know indigenous  African-Americans we've got I mean this is 

3:12

you know Harlem is one of the  epicenters of of Malcolm X movement and  you know there's there's a lot of history and a  lot of Muslim investment and tradition in the city  

3:24

um obviously culturally and otherwise financially  New York City is you know at the heart of of  

3:32

America the mayoral race is extremely significant  particularly because of what the race has become  

3:39

about and I think that the race as we've seen  the competition mostly between Cuomo and Mandani  

3:48

uh shape up or at least get more focused the  race primarily is about two things it's about  

3:54

affordability which ties into the MAGA question  okay we can't talk about America and political  

4:03

movements and ideological movements in America  without talking about neoliberalism and the  

4:09

dominance of neoliberalism over the United States  and the suffocating hold it has over US economy  

4:17

and policy that the average and we've talked about  this on this platform before the average American   has not seen real wages increase in decades the  average American used to have the mythology of  

4:30

the American dream which is supposed to be the  selling point of coming here of living here of  

4:35

staying here which is that anybody should be able  to come here and subscribe to the Constitution and  

4:41

work hard and you should be able to move up the  ladder socially and have a lower middle class  

4:47

lifestyle that dream has been obliterated it's  been dead it's been dead for decades new York  

4:53

is a microcosm of that people cannot afford  to live in New York City new York City is so  

4:59

expensive that even the delies have to sell  drugs uh in order to pay the rent and that  

5:06

people are leaving there is flight there's But  there's another part of the story which is not   just the affordability but the powerlessness  that people feel and the disillusionment that  

5:16

people feel when it comes to the corruption of  the American political system from top to bottom 

5:22

that makes people in some cases turn to  drug use and other people any sort of  

5:28

escape Netflix whatever or worse than that  okay this is all tied together because the  

5:37

crisis of affordability the loss of you know  degrees university degrees are now useless 

5:44

large in large part you can get a PhD  and you can make less than an electrician  you are still our education system is a joke okay  the the types of debt that people are coming out  

5:55

if they just have a bachelor they're coming out  with tens of thousands of dollars in debt that  

6:00

straddles them for their entire lives um like  any healthare any tick anything that has to do  

6:06

with just good governance and people's ability to  to have a decent quality of life or standard of  

6:12

living and it is tanked at the same time what  have the politicians been putting money into 

6:19

Israel into the NYPD into not  just the NYPD but the NYPD again  

6:26

as a symbol of bloated police regimes that  terrorize the citizens of the city itself 

6:37

especially when they try to exercise their first  amendment rights that they are spied on they are  

6:42

treated like criminals people it's a little bit  hackne to say but they talk about police state and  

6:49

especially in a place like New York City it feels  like a police state sometimes and you could even  

6:55

maybe get away with a police state if you could  afford rent if rent wasn't half to twothirds of  

7:01

your income But when the city is so unaffordable  and corruption is so rampant and people see that  

7:08

there's all of these that you know oh Israel has  healthcare Israel has free university Israel has  

7:14

state-of-the-art weapons how many billions of  dollars are spent how many billions of dollars   are sent what are the the numbers that are coming  in and out of the campaigns people are fed up 

7:23

but people have been fed up fed up for a long time  the layer of paying attention to Israel and that   connection is somewhat new and we'll talk about  that I think in some of the other questions that  

7:31

you have but people have been fed up with the  corruption in US politics for a long time what  

7:36

hasn't happened in a long time is people being  able to believe in the system changing or at  

7:44

least being able to get some change to get some  handle some control some vector of of expression  

7:51

of grievance that will be taken seriously  and that is the significance of Mandani's  

7:56

uh candidacy for mayoral election everybody  else in that race is a cynical candidate a  

8:02

candidate that represents cynicism whether it's  the incumbent Eric Adams who's corrupt beyond  

8:08

measure Cuomo who is also corrupt beyond measure  the other candidates if you saw the debate which  

8:14

descended into the most absurd theater of feelalty  and uh genulection towards Israel where are you  

8:23

going to go on your first foreign trip as mayor  of New York everybody has to kiss the ring say  

8:29

I'm going to the Holy Land going to Israel but  my fourth you get to brag it's my fourth time to   Israel look at this americans are watching that  can't feed themselves that can't afford rent  

8:38

they're watching this and then Mani says "I'm  only focused on New York." That is a radical  

8:45

message that is a message that contains a lot of  hope behind it and people have dared to start to  

8:51

hope that they can bring the city back under their  control and that government might be able to work  

8:56

for them or at least stop stealing from them as  much assalamu aalaykum i'm Muniva Mazari from team  

Donate to Baitulmaal

9:03

Bal Mad muharam marks the beginning of Islamic  calendar a sacred month mentioned in Quran it's  

9:09

the time for deep reflection spiritual renewal  and honoring the significance of Ashuda as we  

9:15

embrace this blessed month let's strengthen  our faith and seek Allah's mercy by showing  

9:21

compassion to our brothers and sisters in need  through charitable giving we can provide vital  

9:26

resources such as emergency aid food clean water  shelter and education to the families who await  

9:35

relief with hope may our compassion be the answer  to their prayers and a source of blessings to all

Zohran Mamdani

9:45

so when we talk about elections we talk about  candidates i don't like politicians i don't  

9:51

trust politicians politicians are not um the  people that I want to hang out with or be seen  

9:56

with or talk to be frank and there's going to  be a whole host of issues that we disagree with 

10:05

we if we go in these things um with the  expectation that you know this is the   Khalifa and he's going to represent Islamic  values and you know establish as much of  

10:14

Islam as he can no I mean no one will pass  that lit litmus test but you have to realize  

10:22

that what you're taking away the threat that  you're taking away by preventing someone like  

10:30

Cuomo preventing someone like Adams preventing  someone who's just totally bought and paid for  

10:36

by Apac is worth the other things that might  come with his mayorship that we might disagree  

10:44

with oh especially last thing especially  in the context of advocating for Palestine  we're talking about a situation where whoever if it's Adams or Quuomo the  

10:55

establishment candidates are going to criminalize  the First Amendment when it comes to Palestine  

11:00

they will do whatever the Israeli lobby says  yeah israelis don't care about the Constitution  

11:06

israelis don't care about the Bill of Rights is  Israel will take the Constitution and throw it   in the toilet and flush it down whatever they  have to do they don't believe in free speech 

11:15

they don't believe in in the right to assembly  or the right to protest or or or the press they   will do they don't believe in it in their own  lands they don't believe in it here they will  

11:23

do anything they can to silence descent and  so who are you going to turn over your city  

11:28

to what are the possibilities that you create  for yourself in the same city where Columbia   University is in the same city that Mahm Khal  was just released and reunited with his family  

11:37

what possibilities are you creating to speak out  to register your protest to draw attention to  

11:45

the complicity and the active participation of the  United States government and machinery in genocide 

11:50

with these types of candidates versus someone like  Meani just that ability the opportunity that that  

11:57

creates alone in my opinion is worth having him  there to prevent other people from being in that  

12:04

same seat so so in a sense I mean your answer um  it uh it is you are balancing the evils here and  

12:12

you're in effect um you've concluded that Mani  is uh the lesser of the two evils or or at least  

12:20

Mamani is a better candidate maybe we can't even  say he's an evil but he's a better candidate um 

12:25

I would even caution because unfortunately we have  totally abused this idea of lesser of two evils   and so I I I try to assue that language as much as  possible especially because it's not enough to be  

12:36

the lesser of two evils that's not sufficient you need to have some indication that  

12:44

opportunities will be created and that certain  threats will be neutralized and off the table  right you can have a situation of lesser  of two evils and those things aren't there  

12:53

in that case you can take your lesser of two evils  and you can go whatever it doesn't matter anything 

12:58

okay but in a situation in   which the threat of criminalizing the Muslim  community and spying on the Muslim community  

13:04

and just having the the city level government in  the pocket of Apac if that is taken off the table 

13:11

Yeah then that is not just the lesser   of two evils that that is a strategic win for the  Muslim community and it has to be taken seriously 

13:18

yeah and Mani to his credit and you know we're not  praising anyone beyond their station there's a ton  

13:24

of things that we're going to disagree about but  to his credit has been pretty good on Palestine  

13:30

he has indicated sacrifice and he has indicated  principle he spoke out well he had a very very  

13:35

public um you know um uh I don't know say outburst  where he he spoke out very in very strong words  

13:44

against the uh the criminalization of disscent  and the use of ICE against New Yorkers um and the  

13:51

ability to to protest against the genocide so he  himself it's not even somebody who is telling us  

13:57

with their words that they will protect protesters  who are going to call attention to the genocide   it's somebody who as a mayoral candidate that  could have taken a safer route decided to do that  

14:09

himself it shows a propensity to sacrifice for  principles in a way that I think is encouraging  

14:15

is it you know we have to temper expectations but  I think is encouraging enough that this particular  

14:20

race and listen the other other races for for the  mayor of New York previously I wouldn't even pay  

14:26

attention to they're all evil they're all in  the in the pocket of Apac no one cracks that  

14:31

threshold to be like that wow this person is  actually worth supporting because it's going   to actually be a strategic win for the Muslim  community and take major threats off the table 

14:40

but I believe that with his particular candidacy  that is the case that that him having him there in  

14:46

office will take certain threats completely off  the table that are very important and strategic   to the Muslim community imam Tom there isn't an  argument that um we get presented with on on very  

Muslim political candidates

14:56

many occasions which is fine even a candidate may  be good on one or two issues they may be good on  

15:01

Palestine but the system is far more powerful and  and the system can influence that candidate and  

15:09

bring them into line I mean we've got examples  of Muslim politicians in the UK who may have  

15:14

come up you know who may have started there  was one particular politician uh who uh only   five years prior to becoming the the Labour uh MP  was demonstrating at a supermarket for Gaza right  

15:26

you know demonstrating against uh the um uh the  the goods that that that supermarket were selling  

15:34

right so you know this was a a very righteous  person who then joins the Labor Party who who  

15:41

becomes a senior politician and within time  forgets about Israel forgets about Gaza how do  

15:48

we prevent these candidates from being consumed by  the very system that they may have problems with 

15:56

absolutely i mean there's there's three things  I think to look for one of them is votes the   second is money and the third is what is that  person's relationship to the party in general yeah 

16:06

okay when it comes to votes and money who funds  you runs you that's the reality especially in the  

16:14

United States where we have a pay-to-play  system and and the campaign donations are   wild encouraging is when a candidate like a  Bernie Sanders or a Mandani comes along and  

16:24

the average donation to their campaign is  $80 $27 in the case of Bernie Sanders that  

16:30

demonstrates a lack of being controlled  by big money interests at least by degree 

16:37

um and essentially as a pay-to-play system we have  to realize that as Muslims we can just as easily  

16:45

play the game and put money into the pot and  then the politician is accountable to us as well 

16:50

and the same goes for votes right and if the  two conflict then votes actually win out over   money which a lot of people aren't aware of  that more important politicians want to stay  

16:59

in their seats or they have ideas of having  a career and raising up the ranks they need  

17:05

votes if you can deliver votes and if you can  deliver donations they are accountable to you 

17:12

the mistake that we've made up until  now is that we have related to politics   and politicians in a purely identitarian way so we see someone and we say "Oh this person's  

17:20

from our community that's our identity they check  the box of course they're going to be loyal to us   no they're not going to be loyal to you they're going to be loyal  

17:28

to whoever pays their campaign right so we have to be we have to be a little bit   more mchavelian we have to be a little bit more  real politic with how we interact with politics  

17:37

these people are not we're not going to be going  to Washington making moral appeals please Mr  

17:42

senator do the right thing no it's got to be I've  got so many votes and I can control so much money   and if you do what I say or if you stop doing  this then you're going to get this in return yeah 

17:51

that's the game and we've seen it work with  other you know the the Zionist lobby is made  

17:57

up of less people than the Muslim community right as a community we have just as much  

18:03

money don't let anybody tell you different  it's really just about organization and now  

18:08

we're not willing to do everything  that they're doing but the general   attitude of how politics works has to shift we want almost like a consumerrist idea of  

18:16

politics where we see someone coming  down we relate we have an affinity or  

18:22

um and we think that we'll be express  loyalty and that person will then do us   favors that's not how it's ever going to work it has to be just about votes and money and the  

18:29

last thing which is important is sometimes you  see people like Mdani and it's it's less common  

18:34

the higher you go so at the city level it's common  to find someone they have to run on the Democratic  

18:39

ticket because you're forced to run on on a  ticket especially in a closed primary state  um but you'll find people that aren't aligned  with the parties that they're kind of a black  

18:48

sheep so to speak within the party itself and  and the establishment within the party is sort  

18:55

of like sitting on the fence trying to see is  there anybody else that we can really do we  

19:00

have to go with this guy and then if there's a  popular enough movement that they're essentially  

19:06

compelled to support this person um that is a positive indication   right if somebody is going to be supported by  Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the Clintons I'm  

19:15

saying red flag like this is someone who  is probably compromised uh to the core mhm 

19:21

but if somebody is an outsider and they have a  more tense relationship with you know with the  

19:29

uh the party heads and figures and stuff like that  then that is an indication of a possibility it's   not a guarantee but it's an opportunity and a  possibility i mean you were pillaried in the  

Negating the Democrats?

19:38

election campaign for um supporting the sort of  abandon Harris and abandon Biden campaign and I  

19:45

think you took a very principled stance which  was that we should not vote for the Democrats   who were responsible for this genocide is it isn't  there a danger of sending mixed messages now where  

19:55

you're potentially supporting or at least you're  you're saying that Mandani as a as a Democrat  

20:02

uh is a better candidate than Cuomo shouldn't  we just have a principle of of of negating the  

20:08

Democrats as we do with the Republicans i think one of the strategic um aims of  

20:14

the Muslim community to should be  to influence and shape both parties  all right and how is that done um in certain  places like New York City it's going to be  

20:24

the Democratic Party it's not going to be the  Republican party so really the nine times out   of 10 it's the Democratic Party primary that is  going to really determine who's going to win yeah 

20:34

that leaves you with very little room to  maneuver that that determines the arena   of the battlefield that you have to fight isn't Isn't the current mayor Adams standing  

20:42

as an independent in the next election he is but he's not expected to really   win right so he's been so corrupt and so his  stock is down in fact the he was only slightly  

20:51

rehabilitated by Trump like sort of at the end  he was really really taking major major hits  um but most people aren't giving him a serious  shot many people are saying this is really  

20:59

between Cuomo and and Mamani right um so you have  to understand what is the arena and what is like  

21:06

for example we ran the numbers in our area in in  Pennsylvania in Allentown and at the city level  

21:12

not at the it's actually a swing district when  it comes to federal politics and even the state   politics but at the local level the Democratic  party runs everything so that happens to be the  

21:20

arena in which you have to fight now what you  want to do is you want to determine the course   and the shape of where that party is headed  on particular issues so that means you're  

21:29

going to be involved in the primaries you want  the Democratic party if there's going to be a  

21:34

primary that you want a pro Palestine candidate to  win over a pro-Israeli candidate it's that simple 

21:41

now if you get to the point where let's say we  have a primary and the pro-Israeli candidate  

21:46

won then that triggers the general election now  you punish because they didn't get the lesson 

21:52

right so this is not it's not necessarily against  principle it's about how are we steering and we  

21:58

have to be able to steer both mhm and again  this is how the Israeli lobby works they do  

22:04

they play both they do they participate heavily  in Republican primaries and also in Democratic  

22:10

primaries as well there is a huge need for Muslims  to get involved in Republican primaries especially  

22:16

with where MAGA is headed and the whole fallout  with you know Israel's stock is so down it's more  

22:22

down than we could ever have anticipated people  are questioning it and they're not like a year ago  

22:27

people used to say and people used to say in the  2024 election to me that the only allies that we  

22:33

have are on the left there's none on the right  that's not true anymore it's not true anymore  

22:41

in fact the right is moving faster than the left  where it goes nobody can you know say for sure but  

22:47

we have to participate in shaping where it goes so so in effect you are saying that the Muslim  

Muslim political engagement

22:52

community here have to constantly  be perpetually non-aligned  yes they should sort of have a a democratic  alliance a permanent democratic or a permanent  

23:02

republic i mean isn't that a shift in in  many ways you're you're calling for quite   a strong quite an important shift in in in  Muslim attitudes towards a political process  

23:12

very much so and you know I'm actually writing a  paper that I'm going to present at the American   Muslim Jurist Association in August framing uh  political engagement and social activism within  

23:22

Sharia frameworks and and discourse and one of  the things that that came about is realizing  

23:30

studying the Constitution and studying the way  that the political system is set up in the United   States the Constitution is plastic okay the Constitution was meant to  

23:40

be reinterpreted constantly the way that  the American political system is set up  

23:46

if you don't participate you're done for  right you have to have sustained focused  

23:52

strategic participation it demands a high level of  awareness attention and participation if you don't 

23:58

your enemies are going to hold all of the keys and  levers to interpreting the Constitution it's going   to determine the scope in which you have to act  and advocate for your things right um and we see  

24:08

this across the board on on first amendment issues  on other types of issues it's being litigated and  

24:15

adjudicated right in front of our eyes so it is a  system that absolutely demands participation and  

24:23

strategic participation so we abs absolutely we  have to be non-aligned we can't be um there are  

24:29

no permanent alliances even in there's no there's  no permanent alliances there's hnah right there  

24:35

are there are ceasefires there it has to come  back to your principles and to your strategy  and it's not strategic to be married to  one particular party or the other in fact  

24:44

that's what Muslims have largely done um  for quite a while and it hasn't really   demonstrated a lot of benefits in my opinion you're an imam and um I need to ask you then  

Fiqh & political engagement

24:56

about the sort uh underpinning of this type  of political activism because of course even  

25:02

with someone like Mumani you know Mumani is very  strong on Palestine and you know I think you've  

25:07

said that he has suffered as a result of his very  uh principled stance on Palestine Israel but at  

25:14

the same time you know he may hold uh socially  liberal views and the Muslim community until  

25:20

Gaza came along were very exercised about how  uh these democratic states in particular these  

25:27

blue states were um uh were imposing a sort of  social order upon them and their families um so  

25:34

like how do we weigh up the importance of um foreign policy in this case you know  

25:41

Palestine and the social liberal front because  some would say that if you end up supporting  

25:49

Muslim candidates who support uh socially  problematic positions then you know we're  

25:56

making the same mistake that we made previously  by opening the doors up for our young Muslims  

26:03

to be corrupted absolutely and there's you know  there's very very important uh concerns that are  

26:08

embedded with that critique but one thing that  my paper goes into are two indigenous tools to  

26:16

the scholarly tradition that I think are very  very important for political engagement one of   them is the uh so the the principles of um and one of the principles of that the  

26:28

scholars have distilled from looking at as  a whole the structure of as a whole yeah   is that averting threats takes  priority over obtaining benefits right 

26:37

okay now this is key because what I see with much  Muslim political engagement is that there's a lack  

26:44

of prioritization okay  that we have many issues that we have concerns  about we have an interest on foreign policy we  

26:50

have an issue and even foreign policy is not  one thing right there's the extermination of   our brothers and sisters genocide going  on right now in Gaza uh and then there's  

26:59

other things like relations with Europe or  relations with other places so even that   there there's room for nuance on that yeah uh healthcare and jobs and economy and first  

27:08

amendment rights that all different things I have  seen few people making a coherent prioritization  

27:15

between all these issues so the which is that  threats are much more important to avert than  

27:23

any particular benefit that can be acred I think  is important to how we sus out and prioritize the  

27:30

second tool that we should be relying on is the  mass not in the reformist progressive way that  

27:36

most people unfortunately abuse the massid but in  the sense that the massid presents a hierarchy of  

27:42

prioritization right you have the the five  massid and you also have levels of threat 

27:49

that not every threat is the same so these massid are life and property  yes life and and money and uh or we say wealth  would be a better translation and you know some  

27:59

are maybe more or less applicable like Buddha  we wouldn't necessarily well we could put that   in there i'll leave that untrated um Dean of  course it's all there but there's levels almost  

28:10

more important than the actual five of the are  the levels of threat that we that we can discern  

28:16

there are certain things that are threats at the  level of the that means that that the bare level  

28:21

essential the actual existence of the thing in  and of itself is under threat yeah so for example   if we were to seed the first amendment to the  interpretation of the Israeli lobby da in America  

28:34

would not be able to survive right they would if  there are people out there that would criminalize   the Quran if they were allowed their maximalist  interpretation of what it was that they would  

28:43

define terrorism they would define anti-semitism  they would define free speech they would define   all these things in such ways that would make it  impossible to live as a Muslim let's talk about  

28:52

France right like almost like a France-like  situation where we can't even establish the   pillars of our dean in America anymore and then  now you're talking about a hijra conversation  

29:00

when do you do you make hijra and when do you not  so that's a level of threat to Dean which is one  

29:05

of the five mass that is at the level that's is at  a existential level and then there are levels that  

29:12

are beneath that right the level like the needs  the things that are very important pillars of that  

29:18

uh of that or of that objective but even if  they're under attack it's not going to result  

29:24

in the complete obliteration annihilation of that  entire uh objective in the first place and then   there's there are things that are nice to have  luxuries to have they're good things to have but  

29:34

they're not really at the level of an existential  threat or even at the next level so this type  

29:40

of nuance I think is very very important  for us to to map out the political issues  

29:47

um according to these frameworks and to be able  to say that and also to be able to to ascertain  

29:54

what opportunities do we have to fight back okay so if we get Mam Dani for example  

30:00

uh let's say that Mamani is pro-LGBTQ in a certain  way but he's also pro good governance that means  

30:07

that he is committed to certain process points of  community input that gives us a window to fight 

30:14

rather than somebody who is uh they're so  pro-LGBTQ and there this is the only mandate and  

30:20

there's no opting out and there's no anything that  you can do you know besides it and then if we have   to weigh that compared to again first amendment  Israeli lobby the ability to protest and speak  

30:30

out about about Palestine and Israel then we would  say okay well we'll ask we'll avert this threat  

30:36

which is an existential threat and we realize  that there is a threat maybe at the level of   hijat or something that's here but we have a clear  opportunity to also push back against that threat  

30:45

even within this then we can run the numbers and  say we think it's worth it is it risk- free no  

30:50

guess what this is life nothing is risk-free right  but we can at least say we made the calculations  

30:56

the calculations make sense and this makes sense  as a political investment and an investment for   the community and we're ready for the fight in  this other area and that's the key part and that's  

31:05

why unfortunately a lot of people who resort to  just lesser of two evils they've got no day after  

31:10

plan it's just you vote for the lesser of two  evils and you walk away and fall asleep for four   years that's not how the American political system  works you have to pay attention every day every  

31:19

week every month every year you have to be present  in the schoolboard meetings you have to be present   at the city hall meetings not everybody can do it  but we have to start just like Allah says in surah  

31:28

to Toba about how not all of you should go out in  uh you know fighting in the way of Allah that some  

31:34

should stay back and study the dean that there is  there is room for differentiation that we need to   start having our community set up where there  there's a of a certain amount of people that  

31:43

are in these meetings representing our interests  reporting back letting us know when threats are   coming down the pipeline when somebody wants to  set up a casino in Irving Texas next to the masid  

31:54

uh that's put out by Zionist money or whatever  so that we're able to respond to these things 

The Muslim American community

31:59

yeah how joined up are the Muslim community when  it comes to or is the Muslim community when it  

32:05

comes to this sort of way of thinking about  about politics i mean I I did attend a a a  

32:12

gathering of brothers and sisters in in New York  uh in New Jersey in fact uh last week and I was  

32:18

um alhamdulillah it was it was really wonderful  to see just how organized some communities are  

32:24

and and how they're thinking about the microlevel  politics and and you know as you said the school  

32:30

boards and and the sort of municipality elections  and thinking about how to navigate the different  

32:36

personalities and groups and parties uh within in  that space uh but I wonder whether um the Muslim  

32:44

community as a whole has thought about that level  of organization yeah i mean that's I think the the  

32:51

task of the hour and one would be I think correct  to even call into question do we have such a thing   as a singular Muslim community true 

32:58

uh we talk about it like that but in reality  there are vast differences and we have to have   difficult conversations across communities that  have different interests yeah um you know there  

33:07

were sectors of the African-American community  that were very critical of uh the position   of of punish Harris and punish the Democrats and some of them had very good reasons for that 

33:16

right um there's also a lot of of experience and  knowledge within African-American communities  

33:22

of doing these things so we need to make  the community which is part of the work of  

33:29

infrastructure and coordination that we're is  the phase that we're in right now where there  

33:34

is disparity there are some communities that  are smashing it that are doing amazing and   there are some communities that are really  not even paying attention to it at all 

33:42

and right now we're in the process of trying to  learn and coordinate and get on the same page and  

33:48

also have dialogue um I think that this is much  more important than dialoguing with people outside  

33:53

of the community i think that you know we have we  have leaned so far into uh interfaith and showing  

33:59

up to this and showing up to that but we haven't  really taken the time to attend to the home team  

34:05

uh in my estimation that if we're able to bridge  these gaps and get on the same page and learn from  

34:10

one another and and form a coherent strategy or  at least even principles and even if we dis we  

34:16

disagree on on on some things that we can start  talking about a Muslim American community and we  

34:23

can start moving together as a Muslim American  community um now I want to understand Donald  

MAGA

34:28

Trump and his base and I think that's a really  interesting phenomenon to to understand i probably  

34:33

come to the wrong city uh to to do that but um  Staten Island right you can go to Staten Island 

34:39

i I know that you've you've studied you've  looked at Donald Trump you've looked at you   know um his his philosophy actually what  do we call MAGA what do we call this sort  

34:49

of I've called it magaism i'm not even sure if  that's that's a term that's used it like is it   a philosophy is it an ideology is it a project  how would you describe Make America Great Again 

35:00

maga is a project that is born out of  the Tea Party movement um you can't  

35:06

again this comes back to our first thing you can't understand the trends in American   politics if you don't understand the vice grip  that the average American is in by neoliberalism  

35:17

the you know this is a very different country than  the 50s and the 60s when this was the world leader  

35:23

in industry and and you know people average person  you know my father could have a working-class job 

35:29

and take care of the family and buy a house that America is a is a memory  

35:34

it's gone across the west across yes exactly why is it gone  it's gone because society has moved in a way  where the government and the corporations have  

35:44

worked in cahoots and there's a legal dimension  to it there's also a capitalist dimension to it   where they have removed the fedters and the guard  rails so that both the government through its  

35:55

taxation and also through the corporations  and prices and the cost of living and also   commodification have squeezed and squeezed  and squeezed and squeezed everybody to the  

36:06

point where people are lonier than ever their  families are falling apart birth rates are down   divorces are way up people are addicted to  opioids they're they're things are not good

36:19

in the '9s right some of the the um  the political trends that came out of  

36:26

the '90s like the third way Democrats okay  the third way Democrats which was started   by by Clinton was a radical departure or a  somewhat radical departure for the Democrats  

36:35

that basically said you know what we're  going to try to be like the Republicans

36:42

it closed the gap very much and it  actually brought with NAFTA being   signed and all of what happened during the  Clinton era this formed a type of consensus 

36:52

a type of consensus around a neoliberal politics  and even a certain type of interventionism abroad  

36:58

even if there were some differences that you  saw the differences between the two parties  

37:03

narrowing and narrowing and narrowing yeah in the  end of the 90s and especially after the after 911  

37:10

what you're getting is the neoonservatives the  neoconservative movement they were again hardly  

37:19

distinguishable from the Democrats in some ways right they were pro- big corporations they were  

37:25

pro-intervention they were war hawks they  were all these sorts of things that there   came to be certain consensus points  between these two political movements  

37:35

uh the third the third way Democrats and  the neocons that hadn't been there before 

37:41

right and these points of consensus were very  

37:46

bad for the American public okay when it just came  to again things like wages basic things services  

37:52

etc we got the rapid privatization of everything  uh higher education became very unaffordable it  

37:59

became uh modeled on the corporate models of  cutting costs and maximizing profits across  

38:05

the board 2008 recession happens there start to  be political shock waves and responses to the  

38:16

consensus the consensus starts to crack people are  starting to become aware that the consensus is not  

38:22

good for the American people what are some of the  movements that come out you could say the Obama  

38:29

wave was potentially one of them okay the Tea  Party movement was definitely another one of them 

38:35

the Tea Party movement on the right yes and we're not you know like listen movements  

38:40

are made up of several different strands right some of those strands are really ugly 

38:47

we're talking you know nivism and racism and white  supremacy and things of that nature but I also  

38:52

do think that it is a little simplistic to gloss  those movements as only being made up of that it  

38:59

was also very much a rebellion against the neocon  movement and the incumbency of the neocons so the  

39:07

Republican party was actually dramatically changed  by the Tea Party movement around the same time  

39:14

just as the Democratic party for a little bit it  looked like it was about to be changed by Obama it   ended up not being changed by Obama really looked  like it was about to be changed by Bernie Sanders  

39:22

and then the Democratic party sabotaged Bernie  Sanders because of what he represented which was   going to be somewhat of a radical change for the  party debbie Wasserman Schultz and all the things  

39:31

that they pulled in order to make sure that  Bernie couldn't actually um succeed within the   Democratic party so then social media happens  now you've got the democratization of media 

39:44

you've got people getting their news from  different sources you got people putting   pieces together that they hadn't been able  to put together before because they're not  

39:51

going to make CNN or Fox News this is how you  understand the rise of the MAGA movement that  

39:59

the the same sense of the rebellion against  the neoconservative incumbency which by the  

40:05

way the neocons are still there we  still we've seen recently with Iran   right the neocons are still there but their  stock is down and their time seems limited 

40:15

you know there was a time when I remember  John McCain singing bomb bomb bomb bomb bomb  

40:21

Iran and that was like a consensus point look  at how far the right has shifted since then 

40:26

right so this is not to paint it as a as with with  rose tinted glasses there's a lot of problems with  

40:33

these movements and these p move movements they  they they grasp at certain um you know ideologies  

40:39

or symbols that are completely misinformed and  misguided and some of them extremely problematic 

40:45

such as the nativism the anti-immigrant sentiment  um the uh the good old days rolling back uh  

40:51

America to a point where yeah racial segregation  was the norm and apartheid was the norm um all  

40:57

problematic things but I believe as an axiom  that when a lot of people are moved by something  

41:05

there's usually a grain of truth in it right  and so what is the grain of truth that the  MAGA m the MAGA movement represents it is a  

41:14

tremendous rebellion against the neoconservative  domination and the perception which is correct  

41:21

that American politics are corrupt and they do  not represent the American people yeah trump was  

41:28

able to exploit that movement and that sentiment  for his own political career is he a true believer  

41:36

in making America great again everything  that that represents I don't think so right 

41:43

personally I don't see Trump as an ideologue even if he has done a couple things and he's  

41:48

talked about draining the swamp and he  has defunded and slashed even sabotaged  tariffs and Yeah yeah yeah the the three-letter  

41:56

agencies and US aid and all these things it's hard  to tell what's done from a position of that's his  

42:03

actual belief that that should happen and what is just expedient for him 

42:08

so yeah sorry yeah it could   be both but the point is that it has created a  movement even if let's take the the situation of  

42:15

possibility that he's completely transactional  and has no actual belief in the ideology  

42:21

whatsoever yeah it's still a movement with true  believers so the movement transcends absolutely 

MAGA influencers

42:27

Donald Trump because before I came here I mean I  used Sammy Hy used to say this to me that you've   got you know commentators like Tucker Carlson  and Candace Owen and Steven Bannon of course  

42:37

Steve Bannon and they have enormous influence  and I've always sort of felt that maybe he's  

42:44

exaggerated possibly their influence because  of course how can influencers have that level  

42:49

of influence over career politicians or overseas  politicians or over people like Donald Trump so  

42:55

there's a personality yes leadership there and  magnaism is very much connected to the person 

43:00

but I think what we've seen and I' I've become to  become more aware of this as I I've I've come here  

43:06

to the US that Tucker Carlson does have enormous  respect and influence uh amongst the base and the  

43:13

base are questioning Donald Trump in particular  over the this Iran action yes so so you know  

43:19

flesh that out i think the Iran uh situation  was a perfect illustration of this dynamic 

43:26

that if you look at Candace Owens Matt Walsh Tucker  

43:31

Carlson the level of betrayal that they felt by  even the possibility that the United States would  

43:40

act at all yeah and they're still going hard like  as we speak as of the recording of this session  

43:46

like they're they're still going on this issue  that and the message that they're sending they're  

43:51

saying that both parties are corrupt neither party  represents the American people that the American  

43:58

people have been getting a raw deal and now the  piece of the puzzle that they have put together  that the Tea Party didn't put together is the Israeli lobby and the Zionist interest 

44:08

right you know and it's interesting because you  know a lot of people say "Oh well these people   are Islamophobes and they would you know wipe you  out or they want to see you whatever." It's like  

44:15

maybe they do right now they haven't yet peeled  back that layer but peeling back the Zionist layer  

44:20

might lead some of them to that layer because  if they start to sniff the way that the Zionist  

44:27

movement and the Israeli lobby has deliberately  participated in the smearing of Islam and Muslims 

44:35

it's not too hard to imagine that layer  being peeled back as well so we see that  

44:41

it's birectional that they both represent the  feelings of a lot of people and they do exert  

44:48

a lot of influence you've we've never seen a  situation like this where Israel is under such  

44:56

scrutiny and people are fed up with the free ride  that Israel has been given from the United States  

45:04

bipartisan consensus for decades and decades and  decades this is a revolt and Trump just based off  

45:11

of his personality is somebody who is sensitive  enough I think to his ego and his legacy that he  

45:18

actually can be steered by some of these these  things um how much and against all of the other  

45:25

influences that he's under who knows yeah but the fact that

45:30

the movement that he has become the figurehead  of now is developing its own politics that  

45:38

has a mechanism to actually perhaps hold  accountable certainly identify a betrayal  

45:47

identify betrayal to the ethos of that movement  that is something that's a positive development  

45:53

we've never seen this happen at this scale or on  the right and because the right has traditionally  

46:00

been the home of the most ardent evangel look  at what what Tucker Cross did to Ted Cruz 

46:05

ted Cruz represents that older generation of  neocons that used to be it was a consensus you   can you know the Lindsey Grahams and the Randy  Fines this is the old style but look at how much  

46:15

their stock is down how exposed they've been  and how many people are turning against them  

46:21

it really makes you wonder what the political  scene will be like in 5 years from now 

MAGA & Israel

46:26

yeah yeah I mean I I want to focus in  on that um that Tucker Carlson interview  

46:31

in particular and and just how far he went on Israel because it it just seems to me and   again maybe I haven't followed it closely enough  but he was going further than most on the right or  

46:41

most on the MAGA riot where uh he was questioning  whether uh the US state whether the administration  

46:47

should be actually funding the Israelis and should  be giving this blank check to Israel whether you  

46:52

know what's happening in Gaza is a direct response  to uh the way in which the American state treats  

47:01

uh Israel with with complete impunity and  and gives it free a free leash to do whatever  

47:06

it wants um like talk to that like why why  is it that Israel and uh has become now so  

47:13

uh contentious amongst amongst these people part of it is the democratization of media  

47:19

and the timing the live the live streaming of  genocide yeah is something that is completely   again unprecedented the democratization has  of media has given people a window into a  

47:31

moral quandry everybody is tested by the moment in which we live 

47:38

that if you are anyone with a shred of morality  or a shred of ascription to a religious tradition 

47:45

this is probably maybe the major  spiritual test of your life  okay but Imam Tom you know you would say like  we would think that the the Democrats right you  

Democrats vs Republicans

47:54

know who've got this sort of liberal moralism  about them uh but the Democrats will be far  

47:59

more alert to just the horrible nature of this  genocide but it's not the genoc and large uh  

48:06

even people like AOC are completely deaf to This is what Malcolm X tried to tell us  right when he told us that you know you  would rather have the uh the wolf that's  

48:17

snarling at you to your face than the fox  that smiles at you and stabs you in the back 

48:23

he's talking about the liberals he's talking about the liberals   for a second when the conservative bigot uh speaks from a place of hatred against  

48:31

Islam that is usually a sincerely held  belief even if it's profoundly misguided  

48:39

whereas when the liberals smile in our faces  and then seek to subvert our community pursue  

48:46

many of the same policies as the neocons uh surveil us criminalize us limit our  

48:51

ability to to say that we're all pro this group  or pro that group that we're all terrorists and  

48:57

you know that we etc are funded by some foreign  government these are Democrats that are doing it 

49:02

right so they're certainly not more principled and  certainly not more moral um and I'm not I don't  

49:08

want to be um misunderstood here i'm not a person  there are some Muslims who say "Well our natural  

49:14

allies are on the right or they're more I don't  necessarily believe in that sort of bifurcated  

49:20

thinking and I'm just looking at opportunities i  believe that both sides need to be pushed in ways  

49:27

that are advantageous to the Muslim community and  it's a detriment to our community to look at one   side and not the other." Yeah that it used to be  that if you were going to even think about um you  

49:39

know dealing with or talking with or reaching  out to someone on the right that you were like   persona nrata or someone that is beyond the pale now we need Muslims on Candace Owens we need a  

49:50

decent Muslim to go on Candace Owens's show or  Tucker Carlson's show and represent Islam candace  

49:57

has not had a decent Muslim interlocutor and she  has proven herself to be a somewhat thoughtful and  

50:03

critical person certainly a person with a moral  streak to her that's willing to change over time  you know but I would say even you know your  initial comment that that Tucker Carlson  

50:12

seems further than most he's not matt Walsh and  Candace Owens and people are going to say in the   comments "Oh my gosh Tucker Carlson denies the  Bosnian genocide and and Matt Walsh says this  

50:21

but he hates Islam." Yeah okay granted but we're  focusing on one particular issue here and it is  

50:28

a structural issue and it is an issue that is  an existential threat because you don't you  

50:33

have to address the entire influence of the  Israeli lobby and the Israeli influence on  

50:38

American politics the hijacking of our academic  institutions and our legal and our political  

50:43

institutions in order to serve a foreign nation which criminalizes even basic Islamic tenants here  

50:50

right that this is something that is of particular  acute um significance and threat to us the fact  

50:57

that Matt Walsh will go on Tucker Carlson and say  that Israel doesn't even really exist right now  

51:02

that any nation that is propped up by the United  States is not a real nation the fact that Candace   Owens says that you know that she will not bend  to evil and she will not bend to the Israeli  

51:12

lobby and that you know there the the level of  critique we could not imagine this we could not  

51:19

imagine five years ago or even three years ago  that people would be seriously debating whether  

51:26

Israel should have happened or not so what why did  you say earlier on that our natural home because   it from more of what you say there I mean you know  that the Democrats are hypocritical and and they 

51:38

uh they treat us with you know with disdain  culturally and ideologically and they think  

51:43

of the Muslim community in a very negative way so  what why can't we then you know see our political  

51:49

and natural political home on the right because I well there's several things so   the right in the United States is contaminated  with a lot of things that Islam is fundamentally  

51:57

against it's contaminated with racism  it's contaminated with white supremacy   uh it's contaminated with a uh a capitalistic  mythology that we don't entirely subscribe to  

52:08

uh very much at all and uh a nivism you know  that is against our ethos and we could go down  

52:14

you know there's an anti-immigrant sentiment and  lots of things that we could talk about but more   important than that maybe even like primary  before all of those considerations is that  

52:23

I reject the idea that we have to hitch our  wagon to one or the other in the first place 

52:29

i don't think that's smart politics right um when it comes to how we are   engaging we're not looking for the  people who are most similar to us 

52:38

yeah uh in order to ride on their coattails to  get what we want we're actually just treating  

52:44

things on a case-by case basis what are the  opportunities of the moment right now for   example the First Amendment is undergoing a  reinterpretation in the US legal system the  

52:53

First Amendment has a couple clauses to it  one of the clauses is the the um the called  

53:00

the establishment clause which is that there  is not going to be an established church yeah  okay so it limits the government support for  any religion okay in a structural way there's  

53:11

also the free practice clause which is that  um everybody has the right to practice their  

53:18

religion fully without state interference yeah and there are points at which these   two clauses come into tension and  historically up until recently 

53:26

the establishment clause has had priority over  the free exercise clause that you could not say  

53:32

that well this is the free exercise of my  religion if it violated the establishment   clause it doesn't matter if it's part of your  free exercise it has to bow to secularism we're  

53:41

starting to see a shift we're starting to  see a shift towards the free exercise clause  someone could say "Oh my gosh but this is the  far right this is the Christian nationalist this  

53:50

is whatever they're not our friends they're  not our enemies they they don't like Islam   all of that might be true but they might be  opening a door that creates a very important  

53:59

opportunity for us that if we are able to for  example I'll give you a very concrete example 

54:05

if we are able to argue in a court of law that uh  BDS boycotting the the occupation of Palestine is  

54:15

a normative Islamic it's a wajip it is a an  obligation that just like an obligation to  

54:21

wear hijab just like an obligation to pray five  times a day boycotting Israel is a unambiguous  

54:28

Muslim Islamic duty if the court shifts to free  exercise clause that has to become recognized 

54:36

all of a sudden all the antiBBDS legislation  becomes unconstitutional this is a possibility  

54:42

a very real scenario that could play out so  that's my whole thing about I don't like to   think of politics as who are we more like and  who do we need to who's our natural I don't  

54:51

believe in natural allies i see opportunities  there's opportunities and there are uh windows  

54:58

of opportunity that have to be exploited in  order to push here push there there's going   to be some things that are possible under certain  administrations that are not possible under other  

55:06

under administrations you have a different set  of problems a different set of opportunities   but we have to have more nuance in identifying  those opportunities and figuring out how to move 

The US Constitution

55:15

um how valuable is the constitution for the Muslim  community i mean until now every time I've I've  

55:21

spoken to US Muslims they tend to talk a lot  about how the constitution is the real protector  

55:27

for the Muslim community whereas in Europe where  we have very flimsy or no constitutions you know  

55:32

we have arbitrary politicized uh legal systems  sometimes you know we've seen that in France for  

55:39

example you know the the hijab is banned uh in  in public in schools uh but the same level of  

55:47

um of uh of challenge to the Muslim community uh  when it comes to our religious practice is not  

55:53

afforded to you know the other communities who get  away with far more symbolic gestures when it comes  

55:59

to their religious practice now in the US uh we've  always believed and US Muslims have always told me  

56:05

that the constitution is is um is blind you know  it accepts all communities equally but of course  

56:12

you know the arrest of Mahmud Khalil is an example  of the sort of arbitrary politicized use of of the  

56:19

state and uh I know across the country you've  had Sharia banned in Texas and you've got BDS  

56:25

you know to even call for uh BDS now will become  illegal in some states and So and and these are  

56:31

the this is the right that's that's calling for  it so you know is the constitution really there  

56:37

to protect or like any other western state the  constitution could be used you know as a uh in an  

56:44

arbitrary way when it comes to Muslims i mean it  the constitution is made to be a plastic document 

56:51

and that was plastic by plastic I mean it  it is yet to be shaped that it was meant   to be breathed into life and shaped in  the moment and this is actually even the  

56:59

intent of the founders the founders realized that they weren't going to be able to create   an oified uh legal structure that they created  certain mechanisms of change and interpretation  

57:08

that would have to be figured out later and could  be renewed um from time to time so that presents  

57:14

a schizophrenic reality that you have to again  what we talked about earlier as the the duty to  

57:21

have a highly alert and involved practice of  politics because if you completely don't play  

57:29

the game that means that your enemies are the only  ones left playing the game and they are going to  

57:34

work very hard to interpret the constitution and  enshrine an interpretation of the constitution   that's going to make your life impossible right so the the constitution could be  

57:43

interpreted in a way that completely uh eliminates  the ability to live as a Muslim as a practicing  

57:50

devout Muslim in the United States um and in order  for that to not happen it takes activism it takes  

57:58

you know political engagement it takes strategy  it takes this type of involvement and thinking   um and these types of shifts that we're  talking about in how the first amendment is  

58:06

uh is interpreted and applied in how different  clauses of different amendments are take priority  

58:12

over one of the all of these things are in play so this is part of any community strategy and  

58:19

every community you know the funny thing  is that Israelis and the Israeli lobby it  

58:24

really is just about they uh they project  right every accusation as a confession you   know the the takeover that they accuse  Muslims in America of wanting to commit  

58:34

is something that they've already succeeded in and um what they really don't want is they don't  

58:39

want anyone playing their game they don't want  any competition in that space but if the Heritage  

58:45

Foundation can come up with a project 2025 and you  better be sure that Apac has a project 2025 and  

58:51

every other interest group has a project 2025 the  only people without a project 2025 are the Muslims  

58:58

so we have to go through these exercises and  it's part of our political maturity to be able   to understand that yes nothing is set in stone  here you have a certain you know gelatin inshallah  

59:10

halal gelatin structure right that's very very  flimsy it can be shaped in a multitude of ways you  

59:16

have to participate in the shaping of this system  in a way that is beneficial to your community if  

59:21

you don't it will be shaped without your input  and it could be it could be shaped in a way that  

59:26

will make that will be an existential threat to  your community i've got one last question for you   I am imam Tom and that's really I want to pivot  away from the sort of political conversation to  

Mosques in the US

59:36

uh the community i mean I've I've now interacted  uh with a number of community groups here in New  

59:42

York and I've I've just found it marvelous as to  how uh the mosque is at the center of the Muslim  

59:49

community and and so many services are provided  by the mosque and young people uh are catered for  

59:54

and women are catered for and elderly groups and  even non-Muslims there are soup kitchens attached  

59:59

to moss i know Shadi Alasi Shak Shadi has a soup  kitchen attached to his mosque and there's a lot  

1:00:05

going on in the mosque and I I contrast that  and again I don't want to generalize but you've   been to Britain you know our mosques are very  functional we we tend to do the prayer really  

1:00:15

well and alhamdulillah people turn up to pray i  mean you know the mug pray is like Juma in some   in some places so there is a a de a a devotion  to uh the religious practices but but the mosque  

1:00:27

isn't really the hub if we want to do something  for young people we tend to do it outside of   the mosque or for women or for for other for you  know it tends to be in community centers or other  

1:00:37

hired spaces i mean what what lessons I suppose  you've been to Britain you've traveled around 

1:00:42

uh I'm going to take back some some really  good news about the Muslim community in in   America i know that's not often said by us  Brits uh but but you know your reflections  

1:00:54

really on on on how this has happened and how  the Muslim community in America have organized  

1:01:00

themselves really well around the mosques i think that the the different dynamics are  

1:01:05

responsible for the the reactions from the two  different places so in the United States I mean  

1:01:10

people say we're not a country we're a continent it's extremely large like it's easier it's I  

1:01:15

think just as far to fly to London than it  is to fly to California um and that means  

1:01:22

that our population is extremely diffuse  um and it's also not that much right as  

1:01:28

a national whole or even in in particular  communities we don't make up a critical mass 

1:01:33

in most of the places that Muslim population  exists in so when you are more spread out  

1:01:39

um and there's other factors as well many people  have pointed out to class factors and immigration   and things of that that's also true to an  extent but I think that the the forces that  

1:01:52

are pulling you away from Islam are so ubiquitous  and aggressive here that it really really forced  

1:01:59

Muslims to make their mosques as community  centers that um there's an understanding  

1:02:05

that Yes in order we don't have that insolarity  in our homes or in our neighborhoods mostly and  

1:02:13

so the only place to have a center of gravity  right uh you can afford to treat the mosque  

1:02:19

as just the place of prayer if your center of  gravity for keeping people acculturated into   the faith is the home or extended relatives or  whatever but if you don't have those forces then  

1:02:29

you need that center of gravity what's going to  be the center of gravity for us it is the mosque  right so there became a sense that if we don't  want to lose the next generation or the women  

1:02:40

that there's a very much an ethos of you have  to cater to these segments of the population  

1:02:46

um you have to provide programming for them  that's targeted for youth and targeted for   women and if you want women to attend lectures  and educate themselves in Dean you're going to  

1:02:56

have to provide child care and you're going  to have to take care of their needs right so   there's definitely much more of a catering I I  in my observation that goes on with the way that  

1:03:06

masids try to program and I think that's just  because without it in the United States I mean  

1:03:11

you know you'll be you know your kids will be  doing football or they'll be doing basketball   or something else and you won't see the mosque for  a long time you know the United States especially  

1:03:21

the socially mobile middle class it's very much  about filling up your schedule right you have  

1:03:30

this extra you have your extracurriculars they're  going to go on your resume and etc etc you've got   everything and it's very easy for the mosque to  get subtracted entirely but to have those programs  

1:03:39

that act you I mean even in in Allentown we've got  uh martial arts classes in the mosques we've got  

1:03:45

uh homeschooling groups meet in the mosques we've  got right so that maintains that gravity in the  

1:03:52

best way we found out how uh and there's lots of  challenges and you know um we're doing the best we  

1:03:58

can but I think that that's one of the things that  is responsible for that difference alhamdulillah   now I think we can learn a lot uh from the  way you you guys have organized your masids  

1:04:07

here your massid here and it's uh it's really  great to see alhamdulillah look I im Tomak I  

1:04:13

think it's been a really interesting conversation  thank you so much for your time today thank you

1:04:22

please remember to subscribe to our social  media and YouTube channels and head over   to our website thinkingmuslim.com  to sign up to my weekly newsletter


Previous
Previous

Ep 238. - Has Sufism Become a Tool for Autocrats? with Dr Shadee Elmasry

Next
Next

Ep 236. - How Europe Erased Islam with Dr Francesca Bocca-Aldaqre