Ep 236. - How Europe Erased Islam with Dr Francesca Bocca-Aldaqre

You can also listen to the episode using the links below, remember to subscribe so you never miss a show

AppleSpotify • GoogleStitcher • or on Alexa

Please leave us a review on Apple Podcasts and a rating on Spotify - it helps us reach a wider audience

Why has the West obsessed about Islam for centuries? European thinkers and philosophers have for long caricatured Islam and its key figures, painting a picture of the faith that persists today. Dr. Francesca Bocca-Aldaqre offers a thoughtful reflection of the place of Islam in European imagination over the past few centuries.

Dr. Francesca Bocca-Aldaqre holds a MSc in Neuro-Cognitive Psychology & a PhD in Systemic Neuroscience (both from Ludwig-Maximilians Universität Munich, Germany) and a Diploma in Islamic Psychology (Cambridge Muslim College). She works as a counsellor in Islamic Psychology worldwide. She authored several books in poetry as well as essays on the relationship between Western thought and Islam.

Here is Dr Francesca's profile if you wish to find out more about her: https://linktr.ee/francescabocca IG: https://www.instagram.com/francescabocca

Become a member here:

https://www.thinkingmuslim.com/membership

You can also support The Thinking Muslim through a one-time donation: https://www.thinkingmuslim.com/Donate

Listen to the audio version of the podcast:

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/7vXiAjVFnhNI3T9Gkw636a

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/the-thinking-muslim/id1471798762

Sign up to Muhammad Jalal's newsletter: https://jalalayn.substack.com

Transcript - This is an AI generated transcript and may not reflect the actual conversation

Introduction

0:00

why is there such a persistent presence in the  imagination of western thinkers about Islam 

0:05

the west since the inception of Islam  needed to identify themselves as not 

0:10

for western philosophy to survive  there needs to be a malign intent in  

0:16

erasing this Islamic philosophy and contribution  muslims often times have been described as  monsters and represented as monsters in the  

0:24

western imagination the need of defining  as if Islam never happened but it did   figures like Bolterero Montescu  admired bits of Islam parts of Islam  

0:33

but often reduced it to like an exotic caricature the West without Islam does not have a definition

0:44

dr francesca and welcome back to the Thinking  Muslim salam thank you well it's wonderful to have  

0:50

you with us and I think today we're we're having  another really important conversation and that's   a conversation about the West and Islam and how  the West imagined Islam especially historically  

1:02

um post dark ages and how the West interacted with  Islam and today we're going to I suppose engage  

1:08

with a number of western thinkers and how they  viewed Islam and whether there was a malign or not  

1:14

so malign um pretext or context behind uh their  understandings of of Islam but I suppose the first  

Islam in the imagination of western thinkers

1:22

question to ask you is that why like why is there  such a persistent presence in the imagination  

1:27

of western thinkers about about Islam i think  that there is a natural asymmetry between how  

1:35

Islam sees the west and how the west sees Islam and the reason is that Islam sees itself in its  

1:42

imagination as the natural continuation of the  Abrahamic narration and so it can then proceed  

1:50

and go on freely on the other hand the west  has since the inception of Islam needed to  

1:58

identify themsel as not the Muslims really so  while nowadays ideologies many times claim that  

2:07

Islam is incompatible in its nature to the west  what I claim is that the west without Islam does  

2:13

not have a definition and there are some books for  example Muslims in the West imagination a recent  

2:19

book that describes how Muslims oftent times  have been described as monsters and represented  

2:25

as monsters in the western imagination because  they had to be the other the opposite that's  

2:31

fascinating because of course when we think about  western tradition or at least in in the the common  

2:37

uh conversations we have about western tradition  there isn't really an overt discussion today about  

2:43

framing the west and western philosophy in the  context of of Islam so I I don't know we think  

2:49

about the Westfallian treaty or the birth of  the nation state or you know we engage with at  

2:55

least from a British perspective lock or hobbs  or some of these traditional philosophers that  

3:00

uh develop the contours I suppose of western  philosophy there isn't like a a conversation about  

3:06

Islam but your argument is that Islam is embedded  within uh the language of what it means to be  

3:13

western is that is is that fair to say yes indeed  and there has been a removal from consciousness of  

3:20

it and this removal does not stem from Islam  being incompatible with the West but with a  

3:27

choice of what to translate what to transmit what to talk about which authors to remember  

3:32

and even which names to give to things there are  many things for example that in the west come from  

3:38

the Muslim world directly or indirectly  and they're not given the name of their  

3:43

discoverer their founder or things that have been  rediscovered a new as if Islam never existed as if  

3:49

this civilization was never there and this talks  on the unconscious of Europe about a fundamental  

3:56

fear about the need of defining themselves  as if Islam never happened but it did and we  

4:02

are here so what are we going to do about it i I suppose it begs the question why why would you  

4:08

know 15th century 16th century western thinkers  and philosophers and and artists why would they  

4:15

be thinking deeply about Islam what is what's  going on well on one level they were in fact if  

4:21

one goes back to many scientific works for example  Copernicus he actually cites Muslim scientists in  

4:29

his work as if that was natural and many medieval  authors and even of later centuries did cite  

4:37

uh Islamic authors but it never became a clear  connection between them and their Islamic  

4:44

counterpart in the later rereading because of  course we know that the science the history of   science is not a neutral subject as is a science  itself so there is a narrative about it as if is  

4:56

the one of individual the one of genius the one  of these people that came out of the dark ages  

5:01

and the narrative of the dark ages is also  problematic for us because it tells us that  

5:07

the west almost was not there for a while and  then it emerged and this emergence has nothing  

5:13

to do with Islam in this narrative of course okay so let's begin with Dante dante in his  

Dante’s Divine Comedy

5:19

divine comedy places the prophet sallallahu alaihi  wasallam prophet Muhammad and Alibabalib in in in  

5:26

hell uh while Salahoud and Abarose uh are resting  in limbo i mean how do we interpret this mix of  

5:35

condemnation on the one hand and admiration in  the Christian imagination of Islam this was ever  

5:42

present in the Christian uh imagination until  the world became post-Christian and then there  

5:47

was removal but in the medieval world and in the  Christian world Islam has always been there and  

5:53

Dante's view is not extraordinary uh concerning  Islam it's very typical for a man of his age and  

6:00

of his time so Islam is seen by him as a heresy  what it means that it it is part of the same  

6:06

history and therefore it is more dangerous because  a heresy and the choice of the prophet wasallam  

6:12

and Ali shows also how the Sunni Shia split was  seen in the medieval imagination as branches of  

6:20

what we as westerners could have been but were  not so we need to get removed from that at the  

6:26

same time the usefulness of Islamic knowledge is  acknowledged and therefore these thinkers are in  

6:33

the limbo but why are they there because they have  transmitted something and this is a very dangerous  

6:39

idea because the Muslim world only exists and is  only useful and positive as a bridge to bring us  

6:44

something and there are exceptions for example  Salahubi is placed also in the limbo and is not  

6:50

a thinker per se so also in the medieval world of  course the recognization of virtues for example  

6:56

was important so the example of chivalry wouldn't  go unnoticed but this type of reading of Islam was  

7:04

very common in the west the idea it is something  that we could have been but we're not we need to   defend ourselves to not become like them and  the fear associated with it yet the usage of  

7:14

their knowledge because it was advanced i I uh I  remember reading uh a quote from Voltater where  

7:20

he says that Muhammad was an impostor but a wise  and mighty one i mean fingers figures like Voltera  

7:26

and Montescu uh they admired bits of Islam  parts of Islam but often reduced it to like an  

7:33

exotic caricature how did enlightenment thinkers  both praise and distort the faith of Islam the  

7:39

enlightenment is a very interesting case studies  because what it claims to be is to be a complete  

7:46

break with tradition yet what we see concerning  Islam is that there is a striking continuity with  

7:52

what people have been saying since the middle  ages so for example Voltater and Montescu they  

8:00

satize some aspect that they observe while not  observing Islam because neither of them has a  

8:07

direct knowledge right and  so they didn't study Islam in any great depth  no no all these thinkers actually got their  

8:15

knowledge from Islam from encyclopedias that what  the enlightenment was famous for this encyclopedic  

8:20

work that included all religions of the world and  all things and one could pick and choose and this  

8:26

is again um beginning of a very dangerous idea we  have in the west and that we can have a look at  

8:33

all knowledge like served on a platter of some  sort of um clear explanation or encyclopedic  

8:41

knowledge and then choose bits and pieces as  if we were a higher position as if we are the  

8:46

judge of of humanity of the world and this is  a dangerous colonial attitude basically but  

8:54

um going back to to to Voltater there is this um  strange play that he wrote at a certain point in  

9:00

his life which is Lefanatismo Mahome in which he  tells the story of the prophet wasallam and of  

9:06

course is not his story it does it has nothing to  do with it and it was a play that it was meant to   criticize the church in fact he even asked the  pope at a certain point if he could dedicate  

9:15

it to him as a sort of mock mockery uh towards  towards the church right but at the same time  

9:22

Islam is used as again the monster the one we  could have been but we choose not to be so it's  

9:28

exactly the same dynamic of Dante once over again yeah uh Renon Ernest Renon uh famously declares  

9:36

Islam the complete negation of Europe why was  this idea of Islam as a fanatical faith as as  

9:44

Volater or Renan sort of negation of Europe did  we have currency at the time and beyond that time 

9:50

yes I think that uh Renan even if he comes much  later it's uh 1883 so a lot of time has passed we  

9:57

are again stuck in the same narrative and this  is incredible from the west how how little it  

10:02

has tried to reanalyze its position uh in  relationship to Islam from a cultural and   philosophical and literary point of view and  Renan is is a problem for many sides because  

10:13

what he says in his in his lesson is that Islam is  the negation of Europe and we have already talked  

10:19

about that maybe it's Europe that's the negation  of Islam not the other way around but he also   says that Islam is intrinsically enemy to science really and this stereotype then is perhaps at this  

10:30

point the breakage where the west stopped seeing  Islam as the civilization which anyway produced  

10:36

great scientists produced great philosophers  and removed it from its own consciousness in  

10:41

fact it's the beginning of the 20th century  a lot of changes are going on also at other  

10:46

layers other aspects in fact we can even see in  the Muslim responses to this that they are very  

10:52

weak not well argumented and they couldn't really  tackle the point this is your brother Maztar the  

Donate to Baitulmaal

11:00

CEO of the month of Muharam is the first month  of the year and one of the four sacred months  

11:06

mentioned in the Quran it is a time of reflection  and remembrance and recommmitment to faith let  

11:11

us turn to Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala in this  month and seek his mercy through charity you   can provide emergency aids you can provide food  clean water shelter education to families who pray  

11:24

for relief may Allah accept their prayers through  the compassion of our donors through you [Music]

Jamal al-Din al-Afghani’s rebuttal to Renan

11:38

ghani uh he responds to uh that claim by  uh Renon how how did Afghani respond to  

11:46

it in a in your mind in an apt way in an  appropriate way how did he respond to that 

11:52

so his his rebuttal was very passionate yeah but I think it was not able to see things  

11:58

outside from the box of his time and age  so it was a defense it was a defense to an   accusation which is untrue though  and so he said that although yes  

12:08

um the church as well was an enemy to  science what kind of a defense is that   if it is not true that Islam is an enemy to  science so it then started this whole complex  

12:17

that many Muslim had in the early modernity of demonstrating how Islam in theory would  

12:25

uh be a friend to science as if in practice  it wasn't but it was so uh there is a big  

12:31

conflict on how Muslims see their own history  how they read their own history and sometimes   in defending ourself we actually fall prey to the  same stereotypes that the accusers have towards us 

12:44

why why did that complex exist amongst Muslims  of that early modernity early time of modernity 

12:50

it is difficult to explain uh decolonial scholars  would call it the narrative that there is in the  

12:56

west nowadays and sometimes we have imported that  too so we sometimes see oursel as the villains in  

13:03

someone's else's superhero story to make things  uh simple yet we are not that Islam is its own  

13:09

thing and this is something which sounds so  obvious but to be honest in literature and  

13:14

philosophy and culture there aren't many  people that have really given Islam the   dignity it deserves as a a religion as a people as  a philosophy as a culture and all of them together 

Gramsci’s critique of Islam and Muslims

13:26

right Gshi I mean I studied Gshi at university  and you know he's a very useful thinker and he  

13:31

talks about hedgemony and you know power and  these are really interesting terms especially  

13:37

uh when we're trying to deal with u the war on  terror and some of these some of the language  

13:42

associated with it but um I'm also struck by uh  Grahamshi's statement that Islam is a religion  

13:49

of desert people uh and these broad claims that  Muslims are fatalistic um how do we weigh these  

13:56

generalizations from people who are you know  who we could regard as being quite sympathetic   actually to some of our causes when it comes  to their depiction and understanding of Islam 

14:07

i think that one of the key words is the word  you have used is useful so this thought can   be useful but sometimes it's not useful  and with dealing with foreign thoughts  

14:16

and ideas and Islamic culture we always done  that we do not have a problem to engage with  

14:22

them and we take what is wise and live the rest yeah of course until a certain point there are  

14:27

thinkers that I believe like Michelle Fuku are  too wretched to even deal with so I completely  

14:32

abandon them but in the case of Granchi as long  as we see him as a son of his time anyway was an  

14:38

Italian of a certain period of time and of course  he's going to have a blind spot for really giving  

14:43

other people the dignity that they deserve and  we have to acknowledge it we can still use their   their concepts however we have a problem sometimes  in Islamic studies and Muslims discovering these  

14:56

thinkers and embracing their views a bit too much  that's perhaps the cause also of Edward Sahed who  

15:02

uses Gracian worldview a lot and sometimes we  become a bit enamored with these people without  

15:08

knowing their culture their context and these  blind spots that they have uh they were human  

15:15

beings so they couldn't see the whole picture and  they're missing out what comes from their culture   from their time and so Gshi indirectly admits that  he doesn't know a lot about Islam so when he talks  

15:28

about the shang the vision of the world that  religions have he said well Islam must be like  

15:33

Judaism like Christianity but he doesn't know so  let's keep that in mind and use what is useful i  

Ignorance or malign intent?

15:40

mean so far when you talk about you know Voltater  or Gshi or others it seems like there is a willing   ignorance rather than anything malicious is there  anything you're thinking that implies that there  

15:50

is an acknowledgement of Islam and its scientific  and cultural heritage and richness but u uh in  

15:56

order for western philosophy to and modernity to  survive there needs to be a denunciation or or a  

16:04

uh a malign intent in erasing this Islamic  philosophy and contribution to to modern thought 

16:13

this is very hard to answer  because I I don't know how much   of it is intentional and how much of it isn't looking in particular at the Italian uh context  

16:24

i can say that there is a lot of subconscious  projection going on for example we have very  

16:30

famous scholars like Franchesco Gabrieli talking  about Islam he was an Arabist he knew the language   so finally someone knowing the language speaking  about the religion yet when he talks about Islam  

16:39

in his books and they're still used at university  level in Italy he says "Well religion Islam is  

16:45

is a religion of the past like it doesn't exist  anymore." And I think it's very striking telling   to someone living in Britain from the Muslim  community which is very much alive and well  

16:54

yet in some parts of Europe and in all Italian  books you would find on Islam mostly written by  

17:00

this type of scholars they would say things  like yeah Islam had a great poetry and it's   it's a finished story and this anxiety of saying  that Islam is over perhaps it betrays a bit of a  

17:12

malicious intent but I I cannot know that however  nowadays that we have the language the ability  

17:20

uh to really analyze things as they are I think  that it should be ated to western psych uh to  

17:26

western philosophers that you know Islam is  there is a thing it's alive we have to keep  

17:31

it in mind I I have a number of a good number of  non-Muslim viewers and they may be surprised at  

Are Islam’s glory days over?

17:38

your response there because I remember reading  a book and I can't remember the author's name   uh immediately but he it's a book after empire  and he looks at Catholicism and Islam and and  

17:48

I think another faith and and argues that Muslims  have to realize that the glory days are over the  

17:54

caliphate of you know um um progress in science  and technology but you seem to imply that actually  

18:01

that type of attitude of or that acknowledgment  maybe from his perspective that Islam has to pass  

18:09

has to pass the baton on maybe to western culture  western civilization we shouldn't think like that  

18:15

i mean just just expand on that to me why why  should we not believe and remain good Muslims  

18:21

wedded to our spiritual beliefs why shouldn't  we believe that Islam's best days are over 

18:27

well I think that first of all we have  to request to people that are analyzing  

18:32

our tradition to realize that we are here we're alive we're well we're believing in   what we're believing certainly so we're  practicing what we're believing certainly  

18:40

so and we are transmitting our knowledges and this might seem marginal but a type  

18:47

of knowledge like the eza system so a  direct transmission that we have and   when we study theology we studied from someone  who studied from someone who studied from the  

18:55

author has the potential of reviving at any time to the Islamic world incredible boundaries have  

19:02

been put and incredible challenges in the last  thous0 years so these are mainly relating with  

19:09

colonialism and now they're not there anymore so what is avoiding us to really flourish again  

19:16

i think sometimes either our own fears  and sometimes a narrative that we have  

19:21

agreed on that says that we're dead and so we  we shouldn't have we shouldn't be so fatalistic  

19:27

when it comes to the future of Islam i mean I I  came across a a scholar who said that maybe the   best days of Islam are yet to come i mean is  that is that a an idea that you subscribe to 

19:36

well on the one hand we know that in our  ideas of the end of times they're not   the most brilliant times for humanity but I  think that sometimes we have generalized that  

19:46

from being an aspect relating to theology and  faith to be an aspect related to other sciences  

19:52

such as politics philosophy literature poetry who said we cannot revive that so let us try to  

20:00

be optimistic which is our one of our key virtues  in Islam and let us not take someone else's like  

20:08

death wish as our own reality and at least examine  things as they are great and uh of course you're  

Mussolini, Fascism and Islam

20:14

you're Italian and um in the 1930s um there  was a proposal by Benito Mussolini to open a  

20:23

masid in Rome to mark the closeness between the  Italian regime or fascism and and Muslims uh and  

20:32

I think he proclaimed himself to be a protector  of the favor protector of Islam like just tell   me about that relationship between at least in  his mind between himself fascism and and Islam 

20:43

i think that this is one of those stories that  can really highlight how sometimes propaganda  

20:49

can become something we believe in without the  necessary precautions so we have this story in  

20:55

which in 1937 Mussolini wants to have propaganda  moment in which he gets gifted the sword of Islam  

21:04

if you never heard about the sword of Islam  it's because it doesn't exist and it was made   in Florence actually by the Pani Barlaki jewelry  which is still active I think today and Mussolini  

21:16

asked them please make us sword of Islam so we  can have it and what he did is that he got some  

21:22

marginal tribe leader to gift it to him and  to have this great proclaim that this honor  

21:27

was gifted to him and that's that's nothing new  in politics napoleon tried to do some similar  

21:32

PR stunts as well we know that and however this  uh attempt to get close to Islam has to be seen  

21:41

through the lens of colonial domination of  places like Libya we're seeing Mussolini as  

21:46

a protector would have crashed the resistance and however things were not as easy in fact his  

21:53

proposal of opening this mosque in the 30s  well the mosque was not opened and it took  

21:58

until 1995 and it wasn't open by the Italian  government but by King Fasil of Saudi Arabia  

22:06

and if you go to Rome and you need to find  that mosque well it's quite outside of town   so the symbol of having a mosque in Rome the  city of the church is still not really there  

22:16

although there is a mosque in Rome but what what about this claim i suppose that   was implicit in his uh in his language where  that there is a that Islam and fascism are  

22:25

are natural bed fellows and again you see that  today I mean you know there are some who who   who claim that the authoritarianism that we're  seeing across Europe or or with Donald Trump  

22:35

uh that best reflects some of Islam's sociological  and political beliefs i'm like how how would you  

22:41

how would you engage with that understanding yes  this is a very strange idea that fascism would be  

22:47

an ally of Islam because first of all well the  main islamophobes that we are seeing right now   are really the fascist or the more right-wing type  of extremist so that would be strange but further  

22:57

on we shouldn't forget that the myth of like  the Nazis being closed to the MUI of Jerusalem  

23:03

was actually Israeli propaganda and why was that  created well it was created in order for people in  

23:09

the west to believe that the Jewish state and the  Christians were natural allies so let's exclude  

23:15

Islam we have to exclude Islam again once more we  have to take Islam and define ourself as not being  

23:22

that so let us not forget that in reality what  happened was the king of Morocco helping the Jews  

23:30

was the mosque of Paris helping the Jews during  the Holocaust and there was no such alliance it  

23:35

it really wasn't a thing and if we think about it  in abstract political science term well fascism is   a secular ideology it is ultra nationalistic these  are all things which as Muslim we naturally tend  

23:47

to dislike and that many times the claim of Muslim  being naturally despotic was actually a tool for  

23:53

colonial domination not a point for an alliance  but a point for destruction and threat i think  

Authoritarianism and Islam

23:59

it was Rouso maybe who called he who referred to  Islam as the oriental despot or Islamic history as  

24:06

oriental despot um um there is even some Muslims  I come across they do argue that look the history  

24:12

of the caliphate is one of a strong man and one  of sort of total control and a totalizing impact  

24:17

upon society and and the sort of society working  in a singular direction i mean is there a problem  

24:23

with with with Muslims uh communicating that um  maybe natural we would say not the natural sort  

24:31

of connection between authoritarianism and Islam yes let us not forget that fascism is an ultra  

24:38

power of the state and the weight that we  give to the state and the thickness the state  

24:45

has to have in Islam is very different  than what the nation state looks today  

24:50

so even though we some could argue but I do not  argue that the caliphate was a strong man how  

24:56

strong was really he i mean how many things could  he control with the state how many things could he   fund how many things did he have a control over  did he have a control over the whole educational  

25:04

system no the health system no infrastructures no  because there was the alaf system so even if we  

25:10

agree with that and I do not because of the power  of the whisers the power of the court many types  

25:15

of power were there so the power of the Olar and  the power of these institutions were were in a way  

25:21

tempered they moderated the power of the Khalifa  and it definitely never became a hyper secularist  

25:29

nationalist ideology yeah I mean I'm fascinated  by but I know this is not the central conversation   here but you know it does link to because of  course we've internalized a lot of these criticism  

Reinventing an Islamic Renaissance

25:38

towards Islam and and sometimes embrace some  of these uh criticisms as being part of our our  

25:46

uh belief system um you know your your argument  is that um the uh you know even any thought about  

25:54

reinventing or or renaissance in thinking about  Islamic political systems or about caliphates or  

26:00

about unification has to be very wary of the  authenticity of uh our our our thinking when  

26:10

it comes to uh how these systems would look like  yeah there is a lot that we're giving for granted  

26:16

I think nowadays in Islamic thought and now  moving a bit outside of my topic because it's   more political than philosophical or literary but  it it is true that we're giving for granted the  

26:26

role of the state we're giving for granted nation  state or homogeneity of language or the role uh of  

26:33

the government and all these things are actually  something that ideologically it can be negotiated  

26:38

then in practice that's another story but at least  we should be open in thought about recognizes what  

26:44

we can exist without all this apparatus ivan Agui coined the term Islamophobia in  

26:50

1904 and spoke of three kinds of Islamophobia  clerical racial and rationalist i mean you  

26:58

know that that seems like language beyond  its before its time like how how ahead of  

27:03

his time was this framework and how do we  still see these forces uh in at work today 

27:10

yes so Aguelli was really a person with an  incredible insight on Islam and culture and he  

27:16

was he was actually writing this in an Italian  newspaper which was also published at the same  

27:22

time in Arabic in Egypt so just to give an idea of  how forward thinking was really all this process 

27:28

and he said he he wrote it as a European  criticizing other Europeans so Islamophobia is  

27:35

a European thing it's a thing for the westerners and it really reflects how nowadays it has  

27:41

divided so we have the Christian clerical and  still conservatives and nowadays we have this  

27:47

phenomenon of the most conservative people  not really being practices or clerical but   their ideology is the same and the racist  kind has evolved into xenophobia but it is  

27:57

again the same characterization uh stereotypes  of race of color and then finally the secular  

28:03

kind and we can see all the anti-religious  Dawkins type of propaganda going on so I  

28:09

think that Aguili really gives us a framework  to understand the types of resistance and the  

28:15

type of aggression that we have towards Islam i mean I was struck by I I came across a an  

Influence of Islamic sources on Western critics

28:21

academic piece talking about John Lock who I'm  quite familiar with and how his book on toleration  

28:27

um it it gives a nod to and an echo to a  toleration that he understood existed in  

28:34

uh in Ottoman Ottoman society uh in the same way  um scholars like Dante which we've already spoken  

28:42

about um uh some claim that he was influenced  by Iban Arabi uh and Islamic cosm uh cosmology  

28:50

um do you believe that and does it suggest  that Islam deeply shaped even critics  

28:58

uh of of Islam yes I I do believe there is a  stronger case for the Islamic sources of Dante  

29:04

not only in the divine comedy in fact if one looks  at the poetry of Dante and his poetry of love it  

29:13

really sounds a lot like poetry you would find  for example in the Alashwa by Ibani or his the  

29:19

monarchia or about monarchy really sounds a lot  like Al Farabi and there have been scholars who  

29:25

have been writing about it for example in Italian  has written about it and several other Italian  

29:31

authors claim for this and as for the comedy well  the teacher of Dante Brunet Latini has been for  

29:39

a long time in contact with Islamic civilization  and there are some sources maybe not Arab directly  

29:46

but some sources that talk about the maj of the  prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam and imagine  

29:52

recount the story in a way which is identical to  it now there are some authors especially Italians  

30:00

that try to claim that there is this sort of  universal imagination knowledge and archetypes  

30:05

however if it was about any other culture if not Islam anybody would argue that this  

30:11

is a direct contamination so yes Dante as many  other medieval scholars was deeply influenced  

30:17

by Islam and it is directly traceable to his  sources too earlier on you talked about uh how  

Erasure of Islamic influence on modern science

30:23

western science in a way uh is uh has um has  got a lot to acknowledge from Islamic science  

30:30

and European science in its in its early  days uh really required the advancements of  

30:37

of Muslim societies i mean why are these  foundations marginalized still to today 

30:43

yes one of the key myths that this type of  discussion goes against is the myth of the  

30:50

Judeo-Christian tradition or the Judeo-Christian  roots of science of what the West is today  

30:56

and if we look at famous scholars for example  Fibonacci in the 13th century we look at their  

31:02

biography while they studied in North Africa  and that was common because even a pope perhaps  

31:08

studied in fest and this is argued for but it  is said that Sylvester IIA actually studied  

31:15

infest and he knew about Islamic theology  certainly he knew Arabic and that's not   very common nowadays for a westerner to do yeah copernicus as we said was informed by  

31:26

Arabic scholars and we have already before the at  the year 1000 a lot of translation where this guy  

31:33

Gerard of Cremona he translated over 70 books  into Latin yet to find an Italian translation  

31:40

of the Quran you have to wait until the year 1500  so there has been quite a lot of gatekeeping there  

31:46

however we have point of contacts we have for  example Frederick I the the most the the Christian  

31:52

king of Sicily who had conversations with uh  Muslim theologians and asked them question and  

31:59

had Muslims at his court writing poetry and we  have some other relationships which are not so  

32:06

direct but perhaps the fact that Galileo and  his um scientific method is actually the same  

32:13

reworking of Ibenham and his scientific method so  even if there isn't a direct connection there why  

32:19

not to call it the Ibn Alhhatia method for example right okay but but they neither there's just  

32:24

not a single conversation really in the  public consciousness about that heritage 

32:30

well there starts to be a bit in the English  speaking world yeah for example in my subject   being psychology in all books on the history  of psychology for university of sin in English  

32:40

German or Italian it is always said psychology is  born in the year 1879 in uh by v in Germany but  

32:47

that's simply not the case because there have been  labs of psychology before there have been Muslim   psychologists and Arabic psychologist so in most  disciplines it is like that tell me about Pico uh  

32:58

de la Mirandola and um his contribution to busting  this myth that there is a Judeo-Christian world 

33:07

yes I love the figure of Pico because he was  someone who is very well known in the west for   being a person who had an incredible amount  of knowledge and could synthesize with his  

33:16

memory already was prodigious really amounts  of information which were unaccessible to   others and so he chose what to take in what to  make of his models and he he actually directly  

33:27

cites Iban Rush Iben Cena Al Farabi Iban Abaja  the great thinkers that were available at the  

33:33

time another reason why Pico is so important is  that he was very interested in this idea from  

33:40

Islamic theology which is like the chain of being  from Alhazal and human freedom and eventually he  

33:46

starts writing about it he he writes an oratio  the homminist dignit so about dignity of human  

33:54

being this is so influential because then it  goes through Arasmos of Rotterdam to demon ko  

34:00

all these line of thinkers which we recognize as  having no impact with Islam they have nothing to  

34:05

do with it of course they are purely westerners  yet they're teachers they're inspirations we we  

34:11

can never go back to a point where there is no  Islamic influence in the western thought even   with scholars who've accepted um uh the roots  of of western civilization have some part to  

34:23

play in in Islamic knowledge there is very  rarely a acceptance of Islamic spirituality  

34:31

um I mean why this double standard when  it comes to looking at Islamic heritage   um uh when approaching western civilization i  think that part of it is a fruit of the western  

34:43

Christian experience and so the west is not born  out of a bubble it is born of its own history and  

34:49

its own history it's a very painful history of  uh religious wars and a very painful history of  

34:56

theology and philosophy trying to agree with each  other but not quite really and this is a specific  

35:02

Western European problem it is something that it  has to deal with yet as long as this mindset stays  

35:08

in place as long as this becomes and still is a  conflict of course the spiritual impact of Islam  

35:15

will be diminished because it is given for granted  as a prejudice that spirituality has nothing to  

35:20

do with thought but even western thinkers that  had nothing to do with Islam realized that this  

35:27

conflict is bringing us nowhere one example is  for example Martin Haidiger which we know very  

35:33

much talking about metaphysics and we know at the  earlier part of his life he tried to divide his  

35:38

theology and his philosophy studies his brother  was a priest and they have these letters talking   about it yet the last interview that he ever given  his life it is only one god can save us so how is  

35:50

that let us try to uh follow what these thinkers  had as an insight uh and has a view of what the  

35:59

west could be saved so what the west could be  without this dotomy this conflict within itself 

Was Goethe Muslim?

36:06

i know that you're a student of go and uh he talks  about Islam in a very positive sense in fact if I  

36:13

remember he I think it was you who talked about  this he fasted in in the Ramadan and he prays  

36:19

the prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam if Islam  means submission to God God's will then in Islam   we all live and die which is a very positive  statement um it is that positive like do we  

36:29

universally accept that you know there's  a glimmer here of of a a western thinker  

36:35

uh who very positively is engaging with Islam and  and actually there is a claim that he became a  

36:40

Muslim i mean how how valid is is that claim yeah I I strongly believe this i strongly   believe that he was a Muslim yes and this this  fascination he had with the Muslim world that  

36:49

is usually put down as romantic admiration but  we can see that he did something that the other  

36:55

romantics did not do and that's uh of course uh  practicing Islam that would be one thing he met  

37:02

uh Islam at 21 where he read the Quran just to  further his culture but he became enamored with it  

37:10

to such a level that he wrote some theater plays  that unfortunately I think are not available in  

37:16

English it's the Mahomes it's a it's a song of the  prophet Muhammad sallallahu alaihi wasallam it's   beautiful love and admiration through it as you  would find in Sufil literature i really love this  

37:26

and he writes much more about Islam through his  life and the final fruit just his last work before  

37:33

he died is the Vesus Lishard Devan so this poetry  collection which is dedicated to the Quran I mean  

37:40

I how I don't know how more can you be uh explicit  in what you're saying and I'm not just saying this  

37:46

from his published work i have went through all  143 volumes of his diaries letters and I have  

37:53

found more than 200 references to Islam and it and several of it are letters stating how he  

37:59

lived in Islam and from the divine already in the  published part if someone is interested in finding  

38:06

more they can find the actual translation  of the Basmala in German they can find the  

38:11

transliteration translations of Quranic verses as  well as the fact that we all live and die in Islam 

38:18

but didn't go um rework or at least translate  uh B's horrible play about Muhammad wasallam  

38:27

the fanatisma um how do we how do we reconcile  that with you know this his conversion to Islam 

38:34

yeah I think that actually his reworking of this  play shows how much he was a Muslim because well  

38:40

first of all he didn't choose to do it he was  forced by the Duke of Vimar and of course he   didn't have power on it and so he wrote in his  letters how much he hated translating it and there  

38:48

are some letters which are really funny as please  let me not do it and the Duke is back telling him   yeah I know you're a Muslim sympathizer but please  don't and so he ends up translating but he doesn't  

38:59

translate he have bridges a lot so if one were  to read the French and the German side to side  

39:05

you would see that of course the horrible  insults on the prophet are all taken away  really and there are themes added and these themes  

39:11

are and revelation and subhan Allah they are  really the key points of Islam and the character  

39:18

of the prophet is made much better and the plot  is changed so the prophet never has to lie in  

39:23

the German translation so I think that again  these are signs for people to understand really 

Leda Rafanelli on Islam

39:28

yeah lea Raphaeli uh called herself a Muslim  an anarchist and a feminist uh and even try  

39:35

to introduce Mussolini I think to to the faith uh  what did Islam mean to her spiritually politically  

39:42

and philosophically i mean I've got a quote here  from from Lya um Islam affirmed the dignity of  

39:48

every human being in contrast to Europe's cru  cruel hierarchies to tell us a little bit about  

39:54

Raphaeli please as Lea is is a beautiful figure  and she's part of a wider movement of people who  

40:00

in the year 1,900 and further on as anarchists  uh converted to Islam and of Italians there were 

40:08

was this not much but among the   elite there there are quite a few so it wasn't  a masses movement but it was an intellectuals  

40:14

movements let's call it and she converted Islam  quite early she was 20 years old in in Egypt 

40:20

and she does her best to study Arabic to practice  Islam she's known to have dressed like uh an Arab  

40:26

in a certain way she fasted during Ramadan  as well and she talks about how Islam is  

40:32

a superior worldview to the western western  one all the time in her works in her letters  

40:38

yet at the same time she be she still is an  anarchist so it's quite a complicated figure 

40:43

yeah and of Lea's her inheritage is I'm really sad  about it sometimes because it is either stressed  

40:51

that she was a feminist although right in many  of her works she says I really wish that there  

40:57

was an opportunity to marry like in the Muslim  marriage with responsibility and commitment  

41:03

which is quite a criticism to the free love  that sometimes people associate with anarchy   and even her relationship with Mussolini is quite  interesting because she gifts him a Quran He's not  

41:14

really interested and he falls in love with her and she denies uh being his lover even though  

41:19

of course this is before he was the leader  of fascism but still quite a charismatic and   powerful man because she said that she  wanted a relationship based on dignity  

41:28

respect and commitment so very powerful figure so you've argued that Islam has been long present  

The future for Islamic thought and western tradition

41:34

in the western mind and admired intellectually  but possibly rejected spiritually and politically  

41:40

um like how do we move beyond the binary towards  deeper integration and acknowledgement of the  

41:48

the rich connections and and and melding of of  Islam into an Islamic fort into western tradition 

41:56

i think there are I'll start from two case studies  yeah the first case study is Muhammadbal the  

42:02

founding poet of of Pakistan where he takes most  probably Dante's divine comedy and he reworks it  

42:08

in the Jav Name in a view of heaven and some  of the condemned entities but he he does a  

42:17

change so he never puts people in hell based on  their names and he says that that it was Dante's  

42:23

mistake so he takes from this tradition he takes  on it through art and his poetry is great poetry  

42:29

on the technical side and the politics it's  amazing yet he also tries to remove what from  

42:34

the west could have been dangerous so condemning  people to hell by name as Muslim we don't do that  

42:39

another case study is that I was just recently  in a in a primary school in Damascus and there  

42:45

were kids that were um memorizing and reciting  poetry and this poetry was rhyming poetry in which  

42:53

the children were playing the grape fruits which  were given to the prophet wasallam after tif okay  

43:00

and they were interpreting them and developing  love from the prophet through this art and this   incredible metaphysical understanding of things  so on the one hand we engage with the west on  

43:11

the other hand we aren't afraid of our own way of  understanding heart and the deep spiritual impact  

43:16

it can have on us since we are children because we  are completely so uneducated about art literature  

43:24

philosophy poetry that it comes to us as a shock  when we are 18 or whatever we are and we say this  

43:30

is the thing of the westerners we have nothing to  do with it or we try to do it and it doesn't come   out really well to be honest so engagement and  engagement is not a thing of the mutis right we  

43:41

do not go and say this is haram this is halal  engagement is a thing of the artists that have   to play a role they have always played a role  in in in our community and at the same time we  

43:51

should alphabetize our children and the younger  generation to our intellectual heritage because no  

43:57

Muslim Muslim child would want to become a poet if  he doesn't know there are poets so if he doesn't  

44:02

know how beautiful it can be no Muslim child would  become an artisan and preserve calligraphy if he  

44:07

doesn't know it is a thing so let's keep these  things alive and that will be the best way to   then engage with what is there from the western  tradition too i'm from East London poetry is  

44:18

far from my mind um Francesca uh but yeah you're  you're absolutely right why shouldn't we think big  

44:23

and why shouldn't we introduce our children  to this rich heritage um one final question  

44:29

for you um if you were to revise one western  thinker uh and remember them in relation to  

44:36

uh Islam like who would that be and and why yeah an example for me before uh conversion  

44:43

during and after has always been Gut and there are many reasons for it and   I invite anybody to read his poetry to understand  more of it but there is one incident that comes to  

44:53

my mind and there's once in Vimat he heard that  there was an envoy from the Ottomans and it was  

44:59

time for prayer and he could actually finally see  someone praying so he ran and he could just see  

45:06

this person praying and he writes in his diary  as if the earth had opened and he was praying in  

45:11

the presence of God but yet we know that good  didn't really become like fati or didn't know  

45:18

Arabic too well he actually had the Arabic Quran  on his nightstand but only at the end of his life  

45:24

could he figure out some words and this is such  an amazing example because it makes me think of  

45:31

that hadith in which there is the man coming to  the prophet sallall alaihi wasallam and they ask   him when is the hour and the prophet says what  you have you prepared for it and he said well  

45:40

not much but love for Allah and his messenger  and the prophet respond that you will be with  

45:45

the ones you love and I think that ge is such  an example of that and if we could bring back   literature and art to be about that as Muslims  I think we could really change a lot of things 

45:56

fantastic well this has been a really engaging  conversation Dr franchesca thank you so much   Jac for your time thanks a lot Wyak

46:06

please remember to subscribe to our social  media and YouTube channels and head over   to our website thinkingmuslim.com  to sign up to my weekly newsletter


Previous
Previous

Ep 237. - MAGA and Mamdani with Imam Tom Facchine

Next
Next

Ep 235. - Subverting the Narrative: Exposing Zionist Influence with Dr Asim Qureishi