Ep 246. - From Protest to Power: The New Bangladesh with Dilly Hussain

You can also listen to the episode using the links below, remember to subscribe so you never miss a show

AppleSpotify • GoogleStitcher • or on Alexa

Please leave us a review on Apple Podcasts and a rating on Spotify - it helps us reach a wider audience

One year after mass student protests shook Bangladesh and captured international attention, questions remain about the direction of the country’s politics and the fate of those who demanded change. In this interview, we speak with journalist and commentator Dilly Hussain to reflect on what has changed, what challenges remain, and what the future might hold for the people of Bangladesh.

You can find Dilly Hussain here:

IG: https://www.instagram.com/dilly.hussain88/

X: https://x.com/DillyHussain88

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/dilly.hussain88/

Listen to the audio version of the podcast:

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/7vXiAjVFnhNI3T9Gkw636a

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/the-thinking-muslim/id1471798762

Sign up to Muhammad Jalal's newsletter: https://jalalayn.substack.com

Transcript - This is an AI generated transcript and may not reflect the actual conversation.

Introduction

0:00

We're marking a year since that amazing  revolution. Hassina is directly responsible   for the deaths of tens of thousands of her own  people and that's something which Bangladeshes  

0:08

will not forget and they may not forget. This is  a brutal regime. This is a regime which kills,   murders with impunity without any accountability.  So one thing that India cannot undo the lies,  

0:18

the disinformation from the highest corridors of  power in India to your mainstream pundits. You  

0:24

can remove the head of the snake that head will  grow back and that's what we're concerned about.   There needs to be a zero tolerance to Indian  interference in Bangladeshi domestic affairs.  

0:33

I'm optimistic about the future of my motherland.  It has been 1 year since the cruel government of  

0:38

Shikh Hassina of Bangladesh was overthrown  by a courageous popular student revote. Many  

0:44

students lost their lives as a result of  the deliberate shoot tokill policies of   the administration. How has Bangladesh fared  in this past year? We have journalist Dilly  

0:54

Hussein once again back on the show to  help us understand the new Bangladesh.

1:03

We're here in Kala Lumpa at the prophetic strategy  summit and uh I am here with Dilly Hussein who  

1:10

alhamdulillah we spoke a year back now about the  revolution that took place in Bangladesh and uh

1:22

fantastic to be on thank you for for coming  in again and I know we're we're now in KL in  

1:27

Malaysia but um I think it's an important  conversation to have because it's a year   on so we're marking a year since that  really amazing revolution I think you  

1:36

know most people at the time were amazed at  just how the students had organized indeed  

1:42

um so and we had a a terrific conversation it was  great feedback from uh our viewers in particular  

1:48

viewers in in Bangladesh who thought it was a  very fair uh summary of what was taking place  

1:53

I mean I we spoke just before Hassina fell  uh but even at the time you know I think it  

1:58

was a it was a very balanced account of of the  different groups and different movements. So,   take us back to that point in August last year  when Hina fell. Tell us about what culminated  

Hasina’s Fall

2:12

in in her um uh in her losing her position and um  and what happened in those weeks. Alhamdulillah.

2:23

So basically all kicked off uh last July uh when  the quotota system was reintroduced. Yeah. Now the  

2:30

quotota system is a uh economic uh employment  policy which basically factors in marginalized  

2:38

and discriminated uh groups within Bangladesh and  to ensure that they have a particular percentage  

2:45

or quotota within the civil service. Now as  part of this a large significant portion of  

2:50

that would be allocated to the descendants  and the children of the freedom fighters  

2:56

um those who fought in the liberation war against  West Pakistan at the time. Now what ended up  

3:01

happening and what was the case for many years  under Awami League and Shakasina is that this  

3:07

particular quot those for the descendants of the  freedom fighters was ultimately abused. Yeah. Uh  

3:13

it was immensely corrupt and ultimately it was  all given away to Awami League loyalists many  

3:19

of whom were not descendants of freedom fighters  and in multiple police raids and investigations  

3:26

false certifications certificates were found  uh in the homes of Awami League ministers where  

3:33

they were given out fraudulent certificates uh to  claim that people were descendants uh or related  

3:39

to the freedom fighters when in reality what was  actually happening a huge significant proportion  

3:44

of these jobs were basically given to Awami League  loyalists and that's one of the ways in which  

3:49

uh the army league regime kept its control uh  within Bangladesh. Now people may be wondering  

3:56

what's so special about these jobs. Well in  Bangladesh if you land a civil service job  

4:01

um you're set for life right uh and if you can  claim to be a descendant of the freedom fighters   who fought in 71 you're basically looked after uh  generation after generation. Now this particular  

4:12

quot system was actually repealed. It was actually  uh abolished and it was reintroduced last July and  

4:20

that is what kicked off the riots um or the  protest rather. And what really peaked it was  

4:25

when Hassina came on media and accused uh those  who were peacefully protesting primarily those  

4:31

who from Dhaka University but then he spread  it out to other universities in Dhaka including  

4:37

private universities like B was that who do you  expect us to give these jobs to the Rajakers? Now  

4:44

rajakr is a derogatory term used for those who  fought and sided with west Pakistan during the  

4:51

liberation war and in fact it is a term which for  many years under awami league and she hassina has  

4:58

basically been used to criminalize people and to  silence disscent and that's essentially what it is  

5:03

it was a policy which was initially uh repealed  then reintroduced last June early July students  

5:10

took to the streets basically saying that this  is unfair this needs to be reviewed. Uh it needs  

5:15

to be either radically reformed or repealed again  and there was just a brutal uh reaction from the  

5:22

regime, from the police and from other uh law  enforcement agencies. Shake Hassina loyalists  

US plot?

5:29

argue that her downfall was a result of a US  sponsored plot uh to uh to depose her. I mean,  

5:38

how how credible, even if there's if there's a a  semblance of credibility, is there to that claim?  

5:44

I mean, I looked into this uh and and and did  so very early on. And what's interesting before  

5:51

we get into this is that the same US which  Awami League loyalists claim were behind this  

5:58

uh rainbow revolution as they call it. Um I don't  specifically like that term, but um the same US  

6:04

administration that they are claiming wanted uh  to overthrow Hessa was the same US administration  

6:11

that they're seeking to lobby uh against Muhammad  Ununice's interim government. So it doesn't make   sense. On the one hand, they claimed that America  was behind it, but in the same breath, they're  

6:20

also seeking the same American administration  to pressure the UNUNIS government. Um I don't  

6:25

think there is any truth to it, right? Um quite  frankly Bangladesh is seen by the US through the  

6:31

eyes of India. So naturally there would have been  some concern uh with regards to the stability of  

6:37

Bangladesh and how it falls into the broader  American interest in the region. But that said  

6:43

um Muhammad Eunice Nobel Peace Prize winner who  was the kind of interim head of state uh is very  

6:49

close to the Clintons. He is very close to the  Democrats. There's no denying that. Yeah, but to   say that there was an American took place in that  revolution is basically taking away any legitimacy  

7:01

and agency and accountability from the army  league regime. I have I am yet to be convinced   of anything uh conclusive or tangible to suggest  that uh America was behind it. Even the claims  

7:12

that they wanted to they were seeking to basically  establish a military base there. uh well one year  

7:18

on and there seems to be absolutely no movement no  suggestion uh to indicate that that was the case.  

7:24

So no I I do not believe that America had a hand  in play but that doesn't necessarily mean that  

7:29

American intelligence services may not have got  a whiff of where this was heading. We know that  

7:35

they have uh intelligence assets on the ground  in key Muslim majority countries. They might  

7:42

have got a whiff of where this was going, but  to say that they had a hand behind it or had a   leading role behind it, I just don't buy that.  And it's it's it's just it's a lazy argument.

Civil servant jobs

8:35

in answer to the first question. You talked  about the um civil service jobs and how that  

8:40

bred discontentment within the population,  but of course um the Hassina government was  

8:45

far more brutal as well than just sort of  giving out corrupt jobs to its cronies.   Um tell me about the uh the house of mirrors uh a  Bangladeshi intelligence detention facility where  

9:00

the regime disappeared imprisoned and tortured  political dissident. Look the regime giving out  

9:08

jobs civil service jobs to their loyalists is you  know it's the least of the issues with the Hassina  

9:16

regime. That's just one of many things. This  was a brutal violent regime. A regime which is  

9:21

responsible for the deaths of not thousands, tens  of thousands of innocent Bangladeshies, political  

9:27

dissident, people who protested peacefully. From  the Shapla Square massacre of May 2013 to the  

9:33

anti-traffic protests of 2019 to other protests  are taking place. This is a brutal regime. This is  

9:39

a regime which kills, murders, abducts, imprisons  with impunity without any accountability. Now a  

9:46

god which translates to the house of mirrors  was a secret detention center. Um whereby it  

9:54

was underground very similar to sedaya prison. Um  and the reason why it's called is because uh some  

9:59

aspects of that detention center were surrounded  by mirrors and these were horrific conditions  

10:05

and people were kept there that were assumed dead  or missing and they were there for like five six   years. You know these were political dissidents,  peaceful activists, civil society members,  

10:15

um relatives of opposition party and they were  kept in horrific conditions assumed to be dead  

10:21

or missing for years and similar to when Sadaya  was um revealed and exposed after Bashad fell. Uh  

10:29

that was kind of Bangladesh, not kind of it was  Bangladesh Sadaya moment. Horrific conditions,  

10:36

um cold rooms, all people very little food. There  was even stories of pregnant women who gave birth  

10:43

in these prisons and there were even cases  or where mothers and children were kidnapped  

10:48

and they were kept the kids were kept away from  their mothers and they needed milk and so forth.   Horrific stories men, women, young and old,  political, non-political. Um the people that  

10:59

were kept there in these dungeons um they were  from a wide variety of of the political spectrum  

11:06

and uh yeah it was it was completely horrific  and and similar similar to the scenes of Sadaya  

11:11

um we saw Bangladeshies when they found they  smashed up the walls and they saw you know  

11:19

the evidence of the the dire conditions in which  people were were kept there for years and so the   Awami League Shik Hassina's party has now been  prescribed as a political organization. I mean,  

New government

11:29

do you think that's a fair a fair thing? I  mean, you know, we've got a political party,  

11:35

but obviously we have corrupt elites within  them, but it was a mass party and it would have  

11:41

had ordinary uh Bangladeshies within the party.  I mean, is that a is that a uh the prescription  

11:47

as a terrorist organization? Is that sort of a a  a fair uh judgment you think on behalf of the new  

11:54

government? I personally am not in support uh of  of this decision simply because Bangladesh has a  

12:01

history of banning political opposition parties.  Right? So Awami League they banned Jamaati Islam  

12:08

that that prescription has now been lifted. BNP  was banned. We're now assuming and we're going  

12:13

to discuss this obviously later on. The BNP are  expected to win a a landslide election. At least  

12:19

that's what many are saying and many analysts  are observing. um and and banning political   parties is just simply not the way forward quite  frankly for the very reasons that you mentioned  

12:27

that look within the party and its support  structure. You can have ordinary people that   are not ideologues. You can have ordinary people  who are laborers and and and support the party for  

12:36

whatever reasons they are and didn't take part in  any of its uh oppressive um policies or violence.  

12:42

That said, I would have been more supportive if  the Chhatra League was banned, the student wing,  

12:49

because it is a student wing that has the  blood of tens of thousands on its hands. And  

12:55

this is a criminal entity that was involved  in corruption, racketeering, murder, rape,  

13:03

drug dealing, every crime under the sun. Chhatra  League, the student wing of Awami League were  

13:08

involved in and they ruled with a reign of terror  across Bangladesh. This is a student uh wing, but  

13:15

they moved like a political mafia on the ground.  Uh extortion, kidnappings, you name it. Jalal Bay,  

13:21

they were there's not a crime that they weren't  involved in. Now supporters may say well you know  

13:26

um BNP's student wing have also done some of  these things and and Shibir which is Jamaati  

13:32

Islam student wing have also indulged in some  of these uh violent acts yeah they may have but  

13:38

incomparable jalapai incomparable like you go to  Bangladesh to any of the major cities to any of  

13:45

the campuses and to any of the local bazars and  they will tell you that no student wing of any  

13:50

political party was involved in organized crime  crime in the way that Chhatraali was and we are   talking about murder, we're talking about rape,  we're talking about abduction, we're talking about  

13:58

extortion, stuff which is quite frankly should  not be associated with any political uh wing of a  

14:05

party. So I am against the banning of awami league  simply because what does this mean? Does this just  

14:12

mean that whenever a new ruling party come they'll  just ban the opposition party? That's just not the   way forward quite frankly. But I would have been  more supportive of the Chhatra League and its  

14:22

structures and its key figureheads to certainly  be arrested, face prison time and potentially  

14:28

face prescription cuz they actually did engage  in in in terrorism in political violence. Right.  

1971 Revolution

14:33

Okay. And has there been like an assessment or a  reassessment of the 1971 revolution? Um I mean I  

14:41

note that Shina used that Razakar she talked about  in the last conversation. you know, those who  

14:48

betrayed the revolution and she sort of abused the  memory of 1971. Uh there's been a conversation,  

14:56

a heated conversation about the place of Sheikh  Mojibu Rahman, her father, uh the so-called father  

15:02

of the nation. U today it's very openly talked  about that he was an autocrat and even a tyrant  

15:09

uh within some quarters at least of of Bangladeshi  society. In fact, I think his picture was removed  

15:15

from banknotes if I'm not mistaken. Um, so is  there a is there like a Yeah. How far has there  

15:21

been a reassessment of those events of 71? Because  until now, you know, if you had even questioned  

15:29

uh Majibu Rahman, you were unpatriotic and part  of his sort of betrayal movement. For sure. I  

15:35

mean look um this the entire discussion around the  1971 liberation war and the events that led up to  

15:41

is a very very polarizing uh discussion. Uh it's  it's a traumatic discussion for many Bangladeshies  

15:48

who experienced uh violence and rape from the West  Pakistani army at the time but as well as you know  

15:55

other elements that were siding with Pakistan  and in all honesty and I say this to you as a  

16:00

Bangladeshi or someone of Bangladeshi heritage.  I say this to you as someone who puts his dean  

16:05

before any type of national or ethnic identity.  Yeah. Um that it's not black and white. The  

16:13

narrative behind the events of 171 is not black  and white. Um but let's assess what the situation  

16:18

was and if you allow me just a bit of time to  just give like a basic chronology. All right. So  

16:23

East Pakistan uh which is basically modern day  Bangladesh. um unfortunately for the first 20  

16:30

years uh of this uh new Pakistan that was found  after partition um faced and experienced really  

16:39

unjustifiable levels of uh disparity between how  state wealth was distributed, how um the state um  

16:51

institutions uh would respond to calamities and  emergencies like cyclones and floods and stuff  

16:57

like this, you know, the fact that rice would be  produced in East Pakistan, taken to West Pakistan  

17:03

and sold back to East Pakistan. Simply this was  not the type of brotherhood nation that anyone   envisaged, right? If you think about it, why was  Pakistan found in the first place? It was found  

17:12

on the basis of Pakistan and that this would be a  two nations essentially one that would be a safe  

17:22

haven for Muslims to practice their dean freely.  Yeah. And it wasn't that wasn't the case from  

17:27

the very onset. Unfortunately, there was a very  uh racialized political elite within the Punjab  

17:34

um that dominated the military establishment  in West Pakistan uh who continued policies of  

17:41

uh oppression and discrimination towards  their East Ben East Pakistani brothers. Now,  

17:46

the breaking point, the straw that broke the  camel's back, I believe there was a cyclone in   1968 or 69. M um and it the floods were terrible  and the response from the central government in  

17:59

West Pakistan was very little and when there  was some response uh to that emergency it was  

18:04

too little too late and there was a buildup  of these events taking you know taking place   that led to 1969 1970 then there was the election  then there was the election where she mujib won a  

18:15

landslide you know he won a landslide but it was  rejected by Auban it was rejected by the Islamic  

18:21

parties of West Pakist Pakistan. So in in essence  had they accepted the results of that election,  

18:28

Sheh Mujib would have been the prime minister  of both east and west Pakistan and there was   absolutely no way west Pakistan was going  to allow that. So they put him in prison.  

18:36

They re they basically held an election. He won a  landslide and they struck him in prison basically  

18:42

because they didn't want to accept the decision  or the outcome of the election. But let's also   not forget India's role in all of this. India's  worst nightmare then and now remains a Muslim  

18:55

majority Pakistan or country in its eastern and  western flank. Militarily this is a nightmare. I  

19:00

mean if you just it doesn't take much to imagine  what it would look like. You would in the case   of an open total war you'd have West Pakistan  fighter jets bombing India and then refueling  

19:10

in East Pakistan or Bangladesh and bada bin bada  boom back and forth back. It's a nightmare. And  

19:16

in fact every time India made any kind of gains in  occupied Kashmir was during 1971. It was whenever  

19:23

uh there was issues and and instability in  Pakistan. Uh whenever India lost territory in  

19:30

Kashmir, it was in the early formative years of  of east and west Pakistan. So there's all these  

19:36

factors to consider and there is no denying that  there were lines of communication open between   Sheh Mujib and Indian intelligence services at  the time. To what extent that relationship was  

19:48

is yet to be you know we may never know but but to  say that there was absolutely no Indian role in um  

19:54

you know putting Shakh Muji forward as this father  of the of the country and the leader of this new  

20:00

liberation movement. you know that was certainly  the case but what ends up happening is that you  

20:05

have extremes you'll have those who say that the  entire thing was an Indian plan from the get-go  

20:10

many Pakistani nationalists would say this um but  then there's others that would say no India had   absolutely no role in the events that led up to  1971 and that in fact it was entirely an organic  

20:21

uh movement for liberation uh a cultural movement  a cultural revolution against West Pakistani  

20:26

hegemonic occupation of Bangladesh and I think the  truth is somewhere in the middle And and the truth  

20:31

in the middle is that Sheh Mujib won a landslide  election. He was a very popular leader and when  

20:38

liberation was established in 1971, he was seen as  the uh the father of the nation. But very quickly,  

20:46

very quickly, I mean within a year, he did in fact  become a tyrant and he made Bangladesh into a one   party state which led to his assassination uh I  think within two years. Um can I ask you about  

India’s position

20:58

uh India's position generally towards this last  year because of course they've lost out in a very   big way huge way uh with Hina's ouster now um uh  what how has India responded to uh this last year  

21:12

and and you know what is the what's the sort  of feeling on the ground in Bangladesh towards   India now because of course you know for a while  I mean India had this tremendous soft power in in  

21:23

Bangladesh and culturally at least it was viewed  in a positive light possibly by by great numbers  

21:28

of people. So what what is the position of India  now in Bangladesh? So the dominant narrative that   was shaped by Hassin and the Ywami League were  that India that India was not saviors but they  

21:38

were the ones who basically assisted Bangladeshies  in getting their independence. Yeah. Um India  

21:45

basically saw Bangladesh as an extension of itself  and in fact uh military dossier and documents and  

21:51

internal coms are now coming to surface that  actually what many Indian policy makers at the  

21:57

time really wanted was to basically annex East  Pakistan and basically make it part of uh India.  

22:04

Now obviously that didn't take place um but they  ensured that their tentacles of influence were  

22:10

deeply entrenched within uh the Bangladeshi state  and pretty much in every ministry and also with a  

22:17

huge raw presence Indian intelligence presence on  the ground. India has always seen Bangladesh as a  

22:24

vessel right it as an extension of itself. When  it seeks to open the dam it will flood it. When  

22:29

it extends when it wishes to increase tariff it  will do so. And of all the various administrations  

22:35

and governments and parties from the from the  kind of military leaders that Bangladesh has had  

22:41

u from General Zia and others India's favorite  party was always Awami League um and in fact  

22:48

India shaped the entire narrative um through  cultural influences through Bangladeshi Hindus  

22:56

um what 1971 meant and particularly what India's  role was in the independ dependence to the extent  

23:03

that there would be no independence had it not  been for India's intervention and that's also  

23:09

untrue. Bulk of the fighting against West Pakistan  was actually done by Bengalis in East Pakistan and  

23:15

basically India intervened pretty much quite  late in the game when it was practically done   and dusted. That's the truth for the matter from  my reading of it and and I'd be interested to see  

23:24

if anyone would would correct me because you  would think that there would be no liberation   or independence without Indian intervention but  that's simply not not true. There's also another  

23:33

problematic narrative and this is a cultural one  which has been ingrained in the minds of many   Bangladeshies and has been incorporated within the  education curriculum and that is that Bangladesh  

23:42

itself is more about Bengali culture which  incorporates significant elements of Hindu culture  

23:50

and has little to or nothing to do with Islam  and Muslims because anything to do with Islam  

23:55

and Muslims is associated with West Pakistan. So  India has played a key role in popular culture in  

24:01

creating narratives in shaping educa educational  um uh reforms and curriculums and this was pretty  

24:07

much all done via their assets in Bangladesh but  primarily via Awami League and Hina. Now I visit  

24:15

Bangladesh often um there was a period where I  couldn't visit. it wasn't safe for me to visit but   alhamdulillah I I I visit often and the sentiments  towards India has always been depending on who you  

24:27

speak to is that unless you're an ardent ideologue  of the Wami League it has always basically been  

24:33

that they claim to have helped us claimed  that our independence or liberation wouldn't  

24:39

have happened without the intervention but quite  frankly whatever they did they did for their own   behest they did for their own advantage they did  for their own geopolitical interests. Um others  

24:49

would say that no in fact the main victor from  the 71 liberation was not Bangad. She was actually   India. India won. India managed to basically split  uh Pakistan into two. Its worst political military  

25:01

nightmare was to have a Pakistani eastern and  western flank and in fact India is the real enemy.  

25:08

the hinduta majority India especially now is  actually the main problem uh with with Bangladesh  

25:14

and how it sees itself and its political future.  Um now I would say that India is openly public  

25:21

enemy number one without a shadow of a doubt. The  amount of Indian flags that have been burnt and  

25:26

the Modi placards and the slogans against him. I  mean alhamdulillah look we're probably going to  

25:32

get into this in terms of what does the elections  look like? What does the outcome look like? What   does the future look like? Yeah. And it's sad to  say that I don't have the optimism that I did when  

25:41

I was here. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, in terms of the  conversation we had a year ago, I don't share that  

25:46

level of optimism. I mean, there's still things to  be optimistic about, but it's unfortunate because  

25:52

India has in many ways managed to regain some  level of control within key institutions within  

25:59

Bangladesh, primarily uh education, culture and  media. When you have newspapers like Proam Allah,  

26:05

Daily Star uh who basically you know to put  it mildly and and and politely you know are  

26:12

no different to the Indian media with regards to  their takes on domestic Bangladeshi issues. Yes.   And played a key role in the criminalization  and censorship of political distance from the  

26:22

Bangladesh nationalist party to Jamaati Islam  and to generally Islamic movements and civil   society groups. So there is a deep distrust and  hatred for India as we speak. India doesn't help  

26:34

itself when their uh ministers, senior ministers  come out and refer to Bengali as cockroaches.  

26:41

When they speak of Bangladesh as an extension of  themselves when they speak of and we're talking   about cabinet ministers here at jool, you know  these are not like anchors or like activists.  

26:51

They're talking about people who are part of the  BJP led government coming on media consistently  

26:56

talking about Bangladesh and Bengali in in in  a very derogatory and dehumanized way. And that  

27:01

just further reaffirms what Bangladeshies have  believed for some time and that is that India is  

27:06

not actually interested in any kind of autonomous  Bangladesh who who can decide their political   future. Rather they see us as an as a colony of  theirs and quite frankly their true colors have  

27:16

coming out now and they're throwing all the toys  out of the pram. And we saw this consistent and   coordinated and vicious and malicious uh fake  news propaganda misin misinformation campaign  

27:27

where there was a Hindu genocide in the wake of  the August the 5th very similar very similar to  

27:32

what Assadist did uh when Assad fell that there  was there was a genocide uh against the Dus and  

27:38

genocide against the Alawites. Yes, there were  some sectarian tensions and communal violence,   but to say that there was any remote type of  genocide uh towards Hindus is quite far and  

27:49

quite a lie um and unlable. More so because Hindus  enjoy in Bangladesh a level of freedom and a level  

27:57

of um you know freedom to practice their religion  and access to power that a Muslim in India could  

28:04

not dream of. And it's and it's so hypocritical  that India would take this position whilst the  

28:10

world sees how it treats its Muslim minorities,  its Dalith minorities, its Christian minorities,  

28:15

its pograms, its bulldozing of mosques, its  treatment of Kashmiris that it has the audacity  

28:21

to claim such lies. But it did so in such a  coordinated way to the extent that it even reached  

28:26

Washington. And you had Trump make the statement  before the election uh before uh the last election  

28:32

before November 2024. He came out and he basically  made a statement uh against uh violence against  

28:39

Hindus. He basically pared a lie from the Awami  League. And we also know that Hassina and her  

28:45

son Sajjib have been funding millions of dollars  uh to American policy think tanks to basically  

28:51

um you know discredit the UNICE government albeit  they're not perfect but to you know spread this  

28:56

misinformation and to apply pressure. So India  at the moment is in a better position than it was  

29:02

when we were sat here a year ago. Jalai but one  thing that India cannot undo is what Bangladeshi  

29:08

saw for 6 to 8 months consistently and that was  the lies the disinformation the misinformation  

29:15

from the highest corridors of power in India to  your mainstream pundits and that's something which  

29:21

Bangladeshes will not forget and they may not  forgive. We've talked about, you know, politicians   and pundits who've used this Hindu genocide trope  in order to try to carve out divisions uh within  

Trump and Hindutva

29:34

within the um the wider society. I mean, I I think  that um there has there's a case also of American  

29:41

of Trump administration officials, you know, um  who are quite linked to the Hindutva lobby. they  

29:47

are um the likes of Sajjie Wazed Joy Hassinas  son and Tulsi Gabbard who have spoken about the  

29:55

persecution of minorities in the country and the  creation of an Islamist caliphate I mean talk to  

30:02

Gabbard in particular she seems to be a a voice  for that uh for that Henior element so there's so  

30:10

there's various uh senior policy makers within the  Trump administration that of Indian heritage have  

30:17

deep Hinduta backgrounds, right? And Tulsi Gabbad  is obviously one um uh I believe is one of them,  

30:23

one of the most outspoken uh defenders of Modi the  BJP led government and one of the lies which was  

30:31

spread and in a very vicious and malicious way was  that there was going to be an Islamist takeover.   Now what did happen was that when Hassina fell  various Islamic groups and movements took to  

30:42

the streets and celebrated like any other groups  and movements. Yeah. you know they were happy,   you know, there was there was a level of freedom  that they can now express what they couldn't  

30:50

express for the best part of 15 years and that  was and that included groups like his and others  

30:55

who took to the streets and and other groups that  were waving white and black Khalima flags and this   was of course taken by the likes of Daily Star  and alo and the Indian media then amplified on  

31:05

X and we know that um Elon Musk has tweaked the  algorithm in such a way that the more polarizing  

31:12

uh such news is the more moment momentum and more  viral it goes. And it literally reached to the  

31:17

White House and the likes of Tulsi Gabbard  and others, you know, they spread this lie   and there was absolutely no basis for it. There  is absolutely no basis as far as I'm aware and  

31:27

when I visited straight after the the revolution  and in my engagements with the likes of Jamaati,   Islam and other Islamic groups and movements on  the ground that there was no open or secret plan  

31:37

to make Bangladesh an Islamic state. And let's  also make something very clear and we discussed   this briefly in our last podcast regarded this  last year is that the revolution itself no one  

31:50

party or ideology can claim it. Yeah. The Islamist  or the Islamic groups or Islamists can't claim it.  

31:55

The secularists can't claim it. The nationalists  can't claim it. It was a joint movement amongst  

32:01

students who came from various ideological  leanings, right? from you know your nationalist to   your maist to your liberal leftist to your Islamic  groups and movements and it was a coordinated  

32:12

effort by the students of Dhaka University which  then spread to other universities which then   galvanized the entire country right in the space  of 3 weeks no ideology or no party can make any  

32:22

claim to that and any accusation or claim that  there was going to be an Islamist takeover uh is  

32:27

just again laughable and and something that should  be categorically rejected and and Muhammad Ununus  

Muhammad Yunus

32:32

as a as the prime minister. I mean, how how do  you think he's fared in in this last year? I think  

32:39

he's had a huge difficult task at hand. Look, I'm  not going to make excuses for Muhammad Ununice's  

32:45

liberal policies, his over reliance on NOS's, um  his his approach to basically kind of treating  

32:53

Bangladesh as a charity box. We were hoping that  someone of his caliber of his experience of his   entrepreneurial veneer and experience that he  would you know introduce more radical uh changes  

33:04

um considering that this was a revolutionary  movement we were hoping of revolutionary policies   right but what we kind of saw under UNUNICE was  that it was this kind of again this repeat and  

33:15

over reliance on western NOS's and western  funding and and you know trying to appease  

33:20

the US to say that no we're not x y and zed  we're not going to be this but that was a given   Yeah, but that said, Muhammad Ununas compared to  Hassina is incomparable. You know, I don't think  

33:31

the ununice himself, this is my genuine feeling,  I do not believe that this man is responsible  

33:37

directly for ordering the murder of one person.  That's Allah knows best, but Hassina beyond any  

33:44

reasonable doubt is directly responsible for the  deaths of tens of thousands of her own people.  

33:50

And that's why the court has begun  for crimes against humanity and absent

34:00

if India is seeking any kind of normaly again they  should perhaps hand hina back and then we can talk  

34:08

about normaly. How dare India talk about any type  of you know normalization or a return to what was  

34:16

the past whilst you have the very tyrant in which  the people mobilize to remove. So I don't think  

34:23

there will be any normaly or normalization  or return to the past whilst hina remains  

34:29

there. Yeah. And one of the things which has been  consistent throughout the revolution and and what  

34:34

followed thereafter is this kind of um realization  that Bangladesh has a political destiny without  

34:43

the control of India. Yes, we have to survive  with India. India shares a border which surrounds  

34:50

Bangladesh by 80 or 90%. Bangladesh has no choice  but to coexist in the best possible way with India  

34:58

but to act as a colony to act as a vessel that's  simply something which Bangladesh I believe would  

35:03

not accept the the leoty here the leoty and I'm  hoping and I'm and I'm I'm hoping that the new  

35:10

uh national citizens party led by the likes of  Alamas Abdullah who I met briefly whilst I was in  

35:15

Bangladesh that they carry the momentum how many  h how that um converts or translates into votes  

35:22

when the elections happen uh in the first half of  next year might be April very likely I don't know  

35:28

but NCP is a studentled movement it's it's the  it's the first studentled party in the history  

35:34

of Bangladesh which is basically the students  against discrimination movement ultimately the   students that led uh the revolution against  Hassina they formed this party the national  

35:44

citizenship party being led by the likes of Sis  Alam and Hass Abdullah but back to Ununice Ununice  

35:50

has had an impossible task because not easy  dealing with internal strife of Awami League  

35:57

loyalists still deeply embedded within pretty  much every facet of the state. you've got this  

36:02

external pressure from India um external pressure  of trade uh tariffs and and you know and all kinds  

36:10

of issues and given that he's dealing with all  of this his lordable attempt at major reforms  

36:17

it's particularly to do with electoral reforms  whereby there would be a national effort to  

36:23

register every single Bangladeshi who's eligible  to vote because up until now you don't know who's  

36:29

alive who's dead who's vote who's voting for  who and it's well known in Bangladesh as well  

36:35

as in Pakistan but it's well known in Bangladesh  that under the Hassina regime the police would be  

36:41

paid to man polling offices this is known and  you'd go and vote for your dead relatives you  

36:46

all types of fraud taking place widespread across  the country and one of the good things and very   ludable things which ununice is trying to do  and I don't believe he'll be able to execute  

36:56

and and implement it before April is to have a  national register of Bangladesh voters. Obviously,  

37:02

there were other reforms to do with employment  uh uh to the judiciary uh and other reforms. I  

37:08

think it was six or eight reforms, but the key one  was the electoral reforms because quite frankly,   we need to know who's eligible to vote and then  to incorporate and to create an infrastructure  

37:19

whereby the voting system would be done in a fair  way. Now, as someone who's a critic of uh or or  

37:26

or you know, a skeptic of the democratic system  and the entire way in which the Muslim majority  

37:33

world seek this particular mechanism for their  political destination. That conversation aside,  

37:40

I think it needs to be acknowledged that what  Ununice attempted to do and is still trying to do  

37:45

um is something that is very much needed and I  do not believe whichever party comes to power  

37:51

very likely Bangladesh Nationalist Party would  seek to uh continue these reforms. He wanted  

37:57

time to implement these reforms. He basically  wanted around 18 18 months to implement these  

38:04

reforms. People were concerned that he would  take the full five years, right? And keep in  

38:10

mind that Muhammad Eunis, he was brought in  by the choice of the student leaders who led  

38:15

the revolution. He did not put himself forward. He  was brought in by the likes of Maham, Nahid Islam,  

38:22

and these guys who led the movement. So, and  and and not too long ago, the pressure got so   bad for him that he was thinking about resigning,  right? He he got the cabinet together and he said,  

38:31

"Look, I'm I can't do this anymore." but  they insisted that he stays in power. So,   Ununas has has had a huge challenge uh and a huge  task at hand. He's not been able to execute many  

38:42

of his reforms. He's attempted it. Um some of it  still ongoing. The question now is whether any of  

38:48

this will continue when the new ruling party comes  to power. So in in in that answer you talked about  

Elections

38:55

um the possibility of a BMPled government and also  you talked about the prospects of this new student  

39:00

movement uh that has been created and and whether  it would have electoral weight as it did on the  

39:07

street. So there's a lot of lot of moving parts  here but elections are going to take place next   year and it's from what you gather BMP which is  the main opposition party to army league that BMP  

39:19

will probably win that election. I mean what's  the just just talk me through what we should  

39:24

be expecting in these elections and beyond and  the prospects by the way of of I should say of  

39:30

uh Islamic or very overtly Islamic groups like  Jamaati Islami which you know that haven't done  

39:36

very well in in previous elections. So let let's  let's start with how these various opposition  

39:43

parties responded and reacted to the fall of  Hassina. To begin with, they were all very  

39:50

much supportive of the UNUNIS interim government  and were calling for, you know, to give him time  

39:56

and space for reform. The BMP changed its tone  uh within 3 to 6 months. They realized that uh  

40:05

they're at the cusp of taking the country again.  Yeah. And that if there was an election the next  

40:11

day, there would be there'd be a landslide. And  the more time that is given to the UNUNICE interim  

40:16

government to implement these reforms, the less  chances they will have to get that landslide.  

40:23

Right? So if you give the interim government  let's say 18 months 24 months or the whole four  

40:28

five years which they were never going to allow  cuz they'll threaten them with protest and and   um uh what do you call it when trade unions go on  on strikes or what they call in Bengali and there  

40:40

was always these constant threats that were made  by BMP directly indirectly there's also you know  

40:46

we'll get into this with regards to India's role  within the BMP you know there's many that have   said that the BMP is already infiltrated really  right we had um a gentleman called Salahin Ahmed  

40:57

who returned to India, a a senior BMP uh leader  who was in India in exile for 9 years. All of a  

41:04

sudden he's come back and people are saying  that he could potentially uh be an asset of  

41:09

India. We know that Miz Fakrul along the general  secretary of the party um potentially had line  

41:16

of coms open with India as well. We know that  Tarik Rahman who currently resides in London  

41:22

um could also potentially have line of coms open  with India. Now I'm not talking about line of  

41:28

coms open with India from the perspective that you  know any assuming ruling party would have to with  

41:33

their neighbor and their biggest trading partner  but from the perspective that certain interests   have to be maintained that certain um positions by  certain individuals have to be kept those things  

41:45

cannot change. So the major concerns there. So  BMP initially were for this unitary effort to  

41:53

support Ununice and his reforms. But very quickly  within 3 to four months they were like calling for  

41:59

elections. They were basically coming out by by  saying that look let students be students and let   politicians run the country. Students should not  be running a country. You've done the revolution.  

42:08

You've led the people. You've galvanized the  people. You're not state makers. You're not   policy makers. Um you're not state crafters. you  know, it's time for you to go back to university,  

42:16

basically. Um, and they knew, and this  is true, that the more time they gave the   Ununice government, the more chance that the  a new party that would form, which is now the  

42:26

NCP to go into an alliance potentially with  Jamaati Islam and other political parties,   there'll be more momentum, which How likely is  that? I don't think it's likely now. um simply  

42:37

because I don't know how much of this will  translate into votes because Jamaati Islam is  

42:43

a popular party. There's no denying that they're  the third biggest political party in Bangladesh.   They enjoy huge levels of support. Yeah. But for  some reason that doesn't translate to vos because  

42:54

I believe there's this inherent distrust in the  psyche of many Bangladeshies towards Jamaati Islam  

43:00

which is unfortunate and it dates back to the  indoctrination after 71 that Jamaati Islam in  

43:06

civil society are fantastic in humanitarian  efforts they're fantastic they are the most   educated the most well spoken the well-dressed  they do so much hidma for the communities up and  

43:16

down the country they run schools run schools and  hospitals and Islamic banks and everything Yeah,  

43:21

but for some reason that doesn't translate to  votes and and and and me and seats in parliament.  

43:27

So it'll be interesting to see what the 2026  elections uh you know will will deliver. But  

43:33

I am not so optimistic in in in Jamaati Islam  potentially getting many seats. I'm not even  

43:40

that optimistic sadly of the National Citizenship  Party, the student left party getting that many   seats. I mean I would want them to I would want  them to I would want them to you know um become a  

43:51

healthy opposition to the BMP le government but I  just don't see that happening because there's lots  

43:56

of internal plots happening jalabay there's many  insiders there that are causing internal strife  

44:04

um you know you know people are being killed and  kidnapped and and and the whole idea is to create  

44:09

this this fear of instability and turmoil  which will then justify a strong armed BM  

44:15

MP party coming into power. This is textbook stuff  we've seen in Bangladesh. We've seen in Pakistan.   Um so do I see Jamaati Islam gaining many seats in  the next election? I don't. It'd be good if they  

44:28

did. Um there's just this age-old issue of popular  support doesn't necessarily translate to votes.  

44:35

the NCP. One would hope that considering that  these were the guys who led the revolution,  

44:41

your likes of Hassan Abdullah and Sajis Alam  who are like superstars in the country. Um that  

44:46

you would hope that they'd have huge support but  there's not much optimism there either because the  

44:52

BMP through its grassroots bodies have instilled  amongst the minds of Bangladeshi that similar to  

44:58

the narrative uh what the Awami League would  have said is that these are students. you're   gonna really put the future of this country on the  hands of students who have never run countries,  

45:07

never put together policies. Um so a BNP  majorityled government is something that  

45:15

should be expected. Um the biggest concerns of  many Bangladeshi especially those who supported  

45:21

and participated in the revolution is that it's  just going to be awami league 2.0 uh with you know  

45:29

empty rhetoric uh in support of the revolution.  We hope and pray that's not the case, but many are  

45:34

fearing that this will be the case. So, one final  question for you, Venderly. I mean, you you you   sounded a slightly less optimistic, a pessimistic  note earlier on in the interview where you know,  

Optimism?

45:45

and that's quite different to how you were feeling  last year where you were far more optimistic about   the student revolution. I This is pre Hassina.  um uh why like what what's your what's your  

45:56

thinking about uh Bangladesh's trajectory  in this coming year and beyond? As a Muslim,  

46:04

we have to remain optimistic. What I'm saying is  that the optimism that I had a year ago is not the  

46:10

optimism I have now because of what surfaced and  how it's played out. Yeah. Let's make no mistake  

46:16

and take anything away with what was achieved uh  last July and the and August the 5th. It was a  

46:22

huge a huge accomplishment. Yeah. Historic to be  able to bring down Hina and the Awami League and  

46:31

to send her running via a helicopter to India  was something which Bangladeshi could not even  

46:37

dream of. Right. And we we should not take that  away from those brave Bangladeshi students and  

46:43

ordinary people that took to the streets in their  tens and hundreds of tens of millions. We're not  

46:48

taking that away from them. and and and that was  a truly proud moment for me uh as as as a Muslim  

46:53

of Bangladeshi heritage and I'm not going to take  that away from any Bangladeshi what was achieved  

46:58

but you and I both know the nature of cosmetic  change yeah you can remove the the head of the  

47:05

snake that head will grow back or it'll grow other  limbs in different forms and that's what we're  

47:10

concerned about we many had hoped that there would  be radical reforms with regards to Bangladesh's  

47:18

engagement with India that there would be serious  accountability and prosecution for those who were  

47:25

complicit in Hina's crimes who are still in  Bangladesh who may still actually um end up in  

47:33

positions of power and influence. There's even an  assumption that many Awami you know disillusioned  

47:39

amii league supporters are going to join BMP.  They're not going to join Jamaat. There's even,   you know, theories that are floating about that  now that there's no political party or political  

47:48

home for the Awami loyalists that they're going  to either go to BMP or Jamaati Islam and they're   just going to cause, you know, instability and  fitna within the various different parties.  

47:58

Yeah, I am a tad disappointed with the  speed at which Bangladesh uh has moved  

48:08

in terms of demarcating the Hina policies  with India and this new uh approach to India.  

48:16

India and its tentacles of influence is one of the  key issues which is holding Bangladesh back from  

48:24

success from success and prosperity and that's  just a fact and until that matter is resolved  

48:30

Bangladesh sadu will continue in this cycle uh  this perpetual cycle of over reliance in India  

48:36

economically politically and culturally there are  people right now within the Bangladeshi interim  

48:41

government that supported hass Ina they advanced  the Indian agenda and cause through culture and  

48:51

popular media. There are newspapers out there that  have blood on their hands, editors with blood on  

48:56

their hands. There are there are uh politicians,  journalists, activists, policy makers still within  

49:04

this new Bangladesh and the interim government of  of Muhammad Eunas that had engaged with India with  

49:09

the raw intelligence services that have blood on  their hands. We people wanted to see prosecution.   people want to see people held to account. So  it that's where the pessimism comes from. Not  

49:20

necessarily that Bangladesh cannot attain and  achieve great things. It absolutely can and it  

49:26

has all the ingredients. A young thriving huge  population, a very educated student population.  

49:34

It has all the ingredients to be a flourishing  country within South Asia and Asia in general.  

49:41

it has huge opportunities to look towards  alternative um allies whether it's a nuclear pact  

49:48

with Pakistan whether it's a military or bilateral  military um agreement with China or purchasing or  

49:54

or modernizing its army we saw uh how uh Chinese  fighter jets performed in the skirmish of India  

50:01

and Pakistan there's so many things that could  have been explored and should be explored I just  

50:07

feel that unless India is significantly removed  from the equation. And make no mistake, I'm not  

50:12

saying that you isolate yourself from India.  You simply cannot survive like that. You have to   coexist with India for now. Whilst we're in this  current political setup, you have to survive. It's  

50:23

your biggest neighbor. But there needs to be a red  line. There needs to be a zero tolerance to Indian  

50:29

interference in Bangladeshi domestic affairs. And  that is what I'm a tad disappointed about. Um I'm  

50:35

optimistic about the future of the um we have to  be. Yeah. I'm optimistic about the future of my  

50:41

motherland. I am disappointed at the pace in which  the change has happened and how radical reforms  

50:48

which should have reflected a revolutionary  movement and a revolutionary interim government   did not take place. And I'm very concerned  about the continuation of Hassina and Awami  

50:58

League policies under the new BMPled government.  Inshallah tala um I hope that's not the case. I  

51:04

pray that's not the case, but Bangladeshes are  fearing that this is basically just going to   be awami league 2.0 um with some rhetoric and and  some some aesthetics of support for what happened  

51:15

for August the 5th. But in essence, the BMP are  going to come and they're just going to do the   same kind of corrupt policies and the same type of  nepotism and potentially even violent crackdown on  

51:27

descent. And that's what Bangladesh is endearing  and that and that that is what we should be   praying and hoping doesn't happen inshallah.  Dilly Hussein I think that's really great you  

51:35

brought us up to speed with this last year and  inshallah tala we pray for uh our brothers and  

51:42

sisters in Bangladesh and we hope for better  times. Amen. Thank you so much for your time.

51:50

Please remember to subscribe to our social  media and YouTube channels and head over   to our website thinkingmuslim.com  to sign up to my weekly newsletter.


Next
Next

Ep 245. - The Scholars who Failed Gaza with Dr Farah El-Sharif